Precariousness and Philosophical Critique: Towards an Open-Field Combat with Harman’s OOO
Philosophical critiques are prone to relapse into a sort of entrenchment in which the basic elements of a philosophy are kept from exposure, so that instead of advancing, philosophy easily becomes compartmentalized into specific trends. This article thus seeks the conditions of a non-entrenched, ope...
Main Author: | Arnaut André |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Open Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0024/opphil-2019-0024.xml?format=INT |
Similar Items
-
The Origins of Laruelle's Non-Philosophy in Ravaisson's Understanding of Metaphysics
by: Vincent Le
Published: (2018-09-01) -
All For A Realist Defense of Metaphysics: Graham Harman vs. Peter Wolfendale
by: Sümeyye Parıldar
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Two Ambiguities in Object-Oriented Aesthetic Interpretation
by: Taxier Eric
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Nicolaus Cusanus Unbound: An Investigation into Parallels between his Liberal Philosophy and Object-Oriented Ontology
by: Naruhiko Mikado
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Objecthood, Flat Form, Political Formalism: OOO and Ben Lerner’s Hatred of Poetry
by: Christian Moraru
Published: (2021-07-01)