Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making
Academic literacies pursues a transformative agenda, which involves ‘exploring alternative ways of meaning making in academia, not least by considering the resources that (student) writers bring to the academy as legitimate tools for meaning making’ (Lillis and Scott, 2007: 13). How we select what t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of the Western Cape
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/76#.WFqDcbZ97-Y |
id |
doaj-d7b317b1e7e7467382598c1f9c844ce6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d7b317b1e7e7467382598c1f9c844ce62020-11-25T00:03:32ZengUniversity of the Western CapeCritical Studies in Teaching and Learning2310-71032016-12-0142688710.14426/cristal.v4i2.7648Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning makingPaul Vincent Smith0Alex Baratta1University of ManchesterUniversity of ManchesterAcademic literacies pursues a transformative agenda, which involves ‘exploring alternative ways of meaning making in academia, not least by considering the resources that (student) writers bring to the academy as legitimate tools for meaning making’ (Lillis and Scott, 2007: 13). How we select what the legitimate tools for meaning making are is assumed in these studies, but not established. Given the generally fraught status of religion in the academy, a perspicuous instance of this problem resides in the question of whether religious faith constitutes a ‘legitimate tool for meaning making’. We therefore need to think about how we establish what can and cannot be said to be legitimate tools, and whether this should be decided as a matter of normative principle, or whether it can be arrived at empirically. Further, we would need to consider how such questions are to be properly incorporated into learning and assessment. This article uses qualitative data from studies into religion and higher education to provide some initial thoughts on how these questions could be addressed. It carries out a scoping exercise that sheds light on the possibilities of the employment of religious identity in academic writing. It concludes that religious ideas and identities may on occasion be relevant without implying a threat to disciplinary rigour. http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/76#.WFqDcbZ97-Yvoice discourseacademic literaciesdisciplineshigher educationidentity politicsknowledgemeaning makingreligionvoice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul Vincent Smith Alex Baratta |
spellingShingle |
Paul Vincent Smith Alex Baratta Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning voice discourse academic literacies disciplines higher education identity politics knowledge meaning making religion voice |
author_facet |
Paul Vincent Smith Alex Baratta |
author_sort |
Paul Vincent Smith |
title |
Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
title_short |
Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
title_full |
Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
title_fullStr |
Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
title_sort |
religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making |
publisher |
University of the Western Cape |
series |
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning |
issn |
2310-7103 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Academic literacies pursues a transformative agenda, which involves ‘exploring alternative ways of meaning making in academia, not least by considering the resources that (student) writers bring to the academy as legitimate tools for meaning making’ (Lillis and Scott, 2007: 13). How we select what the legitimate tools for meaning making are is assumed in these studies, but not established. Given the generally fraught status of religion in the academy, a perspicuous instance of this problem resides in the question of whether religious faith constitutes a ‘legitimate tool for meaning making’. We therefore need to think about how we establish what can and cannot be said to be legitimate tools, and whether this should be decided as a matter of normative principle, or whether it can be arrived at empirically. Further, we would need to consider how such questions are to be properly incorporated into learning and assessment. This article uses qualitative data from studies into religion and higher education to provide some initial thoughts on how these questions could be addressed. It carries out a scoping exercise that sheds light on the possibilities of the employment of religious identity in academic writing. It concludes that religious ideas and identities may on occasion be relevant without implying a threat to disciplinary rigour. |
topic |
voice discourse academic literacies disciplines higher education identity politics knowledge meaning making religion voice |
url |
http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/76#.WFqDcbZ97-Y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulvincentsmith religionandliteraciesinhighereducationscopingthepossibilitiesforfaithbasedmeaningmaking AT alexbaratta religionandliteraciesinhighereducationscopingthepossibilitiesforfaithbasedmeaningmaking |
_version_ |
1725433408961642496 |