Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

Combined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph D. Crew, John J. Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-11-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329
id doaj-d7addd05a4d748c0979a6428d3edff27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7addd05a4d748c0979a6428d3edff272020-11-25T03:00:05ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652016-11-012010.1177/233121651666932910.1177_2331216516669329Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant UsersJoseph D. CrewJohn J. GalvinQian-Jie FuCombined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in bimodal listeners for CI-only, HA-only, and CI + HA conditions, using the Sung Speech Corpus, a database of monosyllabic words produced at different fundamental frequencies. Sentence recognition was measured using sung speech in which pitch was held constant or varied across words, as well as for spoken speech. Melodic contour identification (MCI) was measured using sung speech in which the words were held constant or varied across notes. Results showed that sentence recognition was poorer with sung speech relative to spoken, with little difference between sung speech with a constant or variable pitch; mean performance was better with CI-only relative to HA-only, and best with CI + HA. MCI performance was better with constant words versus variable words; mean performance was better with HA-only than with CI-only and was best with CI + HA. Relative to CI-only, a strong bimodal benefit was observed for speech and music perception. Relative to the better ear, bimodal benefits remained strong for sentence recognition but were marginal for MCI. While variations in pitch and timbre may negatively affect CI users’ speech and music perception, bimodal listening may partially compensate for these deficits.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph D. Crew
John J. Galvin
Qian-Jie Fu
spellingShingle Joseph D. Crew
John J. Galvin
Qian-Jie Fu
Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Joseph D. Crew
John J. Galvin
Qian-Jie Fu
author_sort Joseph D. Crew
title Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort perception of sung speech in bimodal cochlear implant users
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Combined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in bimodal listeners for CI-only, HA-only, and CI + HA conditions, using the Sung Speech Corpus, a database of monosyllabic words produced at different fundamental frequencies. Sentence recognition was measured using sung speech in which pitch was held constant or varied across words, as well as for spoken speech. Melodic contour identification (MCI) was measured using sung speech in which the words were held constant or varied across notes. Results showed that sentence recognition was poorer with sung speech relative to spoken, with little difference between sung speech with a constant or variable pitch; mean performance was better with CI-only relative to HA-only, and best with CI + HA. MCI performance was better with constant words versus variable words; mean performance was better with HA-only than with CI-only and was best with CI + HA. Relative to CI-only, a strong bimodal benefit was observed for speech and music perception. Relative to the better ear, bimodal benefits remained strong for sentence recognition but were marginal for MCI. While variations in pitch and timbre may negatively affect CI users’ speech and music perception, bimodal listening may partially compensate for these deficits.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329
work_keys_str_mv AT josephdcrew perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT johnjgalvin perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT qianjiefu perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers
_version_ 1724699464598290432