“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
This paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Sociological Science
2014-11-01
|
Series: | Sociological Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdf |
id |
doaj-d7a087e5070e49199c3f8d994bfbb8fd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d7a087e5070e49199c3f8d994bfbb8fd2020-11-24T23:45:19ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962014-11-0112749351110.15195/v1.a27“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name GeneratorMatthew E. Brashears0Cornell UniversityThis paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the availability of social support. Results indicate that some topics are pursued or avoided with particular types of alters, and that the role of the discussant, but not the topic of discussion, predicts the availability of support from our discussion partners. This implies that some differences in measured network structure may be due to variations in topics discussed, but that topic says little about the supportiveness of the tie once we are dealing with important matters discussants.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdfDiscussion TopicsEgo NetworksImportant MattersRolesSocial NetworksSocial Support |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew E. Brashears |
spellingShingle |
Matthew E. Brashears “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator Sociological Science Discussion Topics Ego Networks Important Matters Roles Social Networks Social Support |
author_facet |
Matthew E. Brashears |
author_sort |
Matthew E. Brashears |
title |
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator |
title_short |
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator |
title_full |
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator |
title_fullStr |
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator |
title_sort |
“trivial” topics and rich ties: the relationship between discussion topic, alter role, and resource availability using the “important matters” name generator |
publisher |
Society for Sociological Science |
series |
Sociological Science |
issn |
2330-6696 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
This paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the availability of social support. Results indicate that some topics are pursued or avoided with particular types of alters, and that the role of the discussant, but not the topic of discussion, predicts the availability of support from our discussion partners. This implies that some differences in measured network structure may be due to variations in topics discussed, but that topic says little about the supportiveness of the tie once we are dealing with important matters discussants. |
topic |
Discussion Topics Ego Networks Important Matters Roles Social Networks Social Support |
url |
https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewebrashears trivialtopicsandrichtiestherelationshipbetweendiscussiontopicalterroleandresourceavailabilityusingtheimportantmattersnamegenerator |
_version_ |
1725496270494105600 |