“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator

This paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew E. Brashears
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2014-11-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdf
id doaj-d7a087e5070e49199c3f8d994bfbb8fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7a087e5070e49199c3f8d994bfbb8fd2020-11-24T23:45:19ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962014-11-0112749351110.15195/v1.a27“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name GeneratorMatthew E. Brashears0Cornell UniversityThis paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the availability of social support. Results indicate that some topics are pursued or avoided with particular types of alters, and that the role of the discussant, but not the topic of discussion, predicts the availability of support from our discussion partners. This implies that some differences in measured network structure may be due to variations in topics discussed, but that topic says little about the supportiveness of the tie once we are dealing with important matters discussants.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdfDiscussion TopicsEgo NetworksImportant MattersRolesSocial NetworksSocial Support
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew E. Brashears
spellingShingle Matthew E. Brashears
“Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
Sociological Science
Discussion Topics
Ego Networks
Important Matters
Roles
Social Networks
Social Support
author_facet Matthew E. Brashears
author_sort Matthew E. Brashears
title “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
title_short “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
title_full “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
title_fullStr “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
title_full_unstemmed “Trivial” Topics and Rich Ties: The Relationship Between Discussion Topic, Alter Role, and Resource Availability Using the “Important Matters” Name Generator
title_sort “trivial” topics and rich ties: the relationship between discussion topic, alter role, and resource availability using the “important matters” name generator
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
publishDate 2014-11-01
description This paper uses a nationally representative dataset of discussion relationships to determine what Americans consider to be an important matter, whether some topics are predominantly discussed with certain types of associates, and if the topic of discussion or the role of the discussant predicts the availability of social support. Results indicate that some topics are pursued or avoided with particular types of alters, and that the role of the discussant, but not the topic of discussion, predicts the availability of support from our discussion partners. This implies that some differences in measured network structure may be due to variations in topics discussed, but that topic says little about the supportiveness of the tie once we are dealing with important matters discussants.
topic Discussion Topics
Ego Networks
Important Matters
Roles
Social Networks
Social Support
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/download/volume%201/november/SocSci_v1_493to511.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewebrashears trivialtopicsandrichtiestherelationshipbetweendiscussiontopicalterroleandresourceavailabilityusingtheimportantmattersnamegenerator
_version_ 1725496270494105600