Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?

Abstract Research on interactions between humans and deadly snakes has focused on situations that result in high rates of snakebite; but we can also learn from cases where snakes and people coexist peacefully. For example, coastal bays near Noumea, in the Pacific archipelago of New Caledonia, are us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinay Udyawer, Claire Goiran, Richard Shine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:People and Nature
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10190
id doaj-d79642add16547e4ad58a07c631540cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d79642add16547e4ad58a07c631540cb2021-04-01T03:15:22ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142021-04-013233534610.1002/pan3.10190Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?Vinay Udyawer0Claire Goiran1Richard Shine2Australian Institute of Marine Science Darwin NT AustraliaLabEx Corail & ISEA Université de la Nouvelle Calédonie Nouméa cedex New CaledoniaDepartment of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney NSW AustraliaAbstract Research on interactions between humans and deadly snakes has focused on situations that result in high rates of snakebite; but we can also learn from cases where snakes and people coexist peacefully. For example, coastal bays near Noumea, in the Pacific archipelago of New Caledonia, are used by thousands of tourists and snakes, but bites are rare. Our long‐term studies clarify reasons for this coexistence. Although 97% of snakes encountered in standardised snorkel surveys were a harmless species Emydocephalus annulatus, we recorded dangerously venomous taxa often enough (one snake per 8 hr snorkelling) that we would expect many risky human–snake interactions in these crowded bays. However, the risk is reduced by low overlap between humans and snakes in the timing of activity, both seasonally and on the diel cycle. Mate‐searching male snakes, the group most likely to approach divers, enter the bays only in cooler months of the year when few beach users are present. Also, snakes tend to be active by night, whereas people are not. Risk is further reduced by spatial divergence: bare‐footed beach users stay in sandy areas rather than the adjacent coral‐reef areas that are preferred by snakes. The response of snakes to disturbance is also important: most sea snakes are reluctant to bite even when harassed. Water currents frequently push sea snakes against hard objects, perhaps explaining why the snakes do not interpret brief contact with a human as an attack. The ability of snakes to flee is increased by uniformly high body temperature, and a complex three‐dimensional aquatic environment. Thus, the danger of snakebite for recreational users of these popular beaches is reduced by aspects of human and snake behaviour that (a) decrease encounter rates and (b) render snakes unlikely to bite even if contacted. The risk to snakes is also reduced because snakes are more difficult to detect and kill underwater than on land. As a result, thousands of snakes and people coexist harmoniously within these small bays.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10190Elapidaehuman–wildlife conflictHydrophiinaeLaticaudinaesnakebite
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vinay Udyawer
Claire Goiran
Richard Shine
spellingShingle Vinay Udyawer
Claire Goiran
Richard Shine
Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
People and Nature
Elapidae
human–wildlife conflict
Hydrophiinae
Laticaudinae
snakebite
author_facet Vinay Udyawer
Claire Goiran
Richard Shine
author_sort Vinay Udyawer
title Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
title_short Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
title_full Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
title_fullStr Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
title_full_unstemmed Peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: Why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
title_sort peaceful coexistence between people and deadly wildlife: why are recreational users of the ocean so rarely bitten by sea snakes?
publisher Wiley
series People and Nature
issn 2575-8314
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Research on interactions between humans and deadly snakes has focused on situations that result in high rates of snakebite; but we can also learn from cases where snakes and people coexist peacefully. For example, coastal bays near Noumea, in the Pacific archipelago of New Caledonia, are used by thousands of tourists and snakes, but bites are rare. Our long‐term studies clarify reasons for this coexistence. Although 97% of snakes encountered in standardised snorkel surveys were a harmless species Emydocephalus annulatus, we recorded dangerously venomous taxa often enough (one snake per 8 hr snorkelling) that we would expect many risky human–snake interactions in these crowded bays. However, the risk is reduced by low overlap between humans and snakes in the timing of activity, both seasonally and on the diel cycle. Mate‐searching male snakes, the group most likely to approach divers, enter the bays only in cooler months of the year when few beach users are present. Also, snakes tend to be active by night, whereas people are not. Risk is further reduced by spatial divergence: bare‐footed beach users stay in sandy areas rather than the adjacent coral‐reef areas that are preferred by snakes. The response of snakes to disturbance is also important: most sea snakes are reluctant to bite even when harassed. Water currents frequently push sea snakes against hard objects, perhaps explaining why the snakes do not interpret brief contact with a human as an attack. The ability of snakes to flee is increased by uniformly high body temperature, and a complex three‐dimensional aquatic environment. Thus, the danger of snakebite for recreational users of these popular beaches is reduced by aspects of human and snake behaviour that (a) decrease encounter rates and (b) render snakes unlikely to bite even if contacted. The risk to snakes is also reduced because snakes are more difficult to detect and kill underwater than on land. As a result, thousands of snakes and people coexist harmoniously within these small bays.
topic Elapidae
human–wildlife conflict
Hydrophiinae
Laticaudinae
snakebite
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10190
work_keys_str_mv AT vinayudyawer peacefulcoexistencebetweenpeopleanddeadlywildlifewhyarerecreationalusersoftheoceansorarelybittenbyseasnakes
AT clairegoiran peacefulcoexistencebetweenpeopleanddeadlywildlifewhyarerecreationalusersoftheoceansorarelybittenbyseasnakes
AT richardshine peacefulcoexistencebetweenpeopleanddeadlywildlifewhyarerecreationalusersoftheoceansorarelybittenbyseasnakes
_version_ 1724176978349654016