Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]

In 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical eva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Döbler
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2003-05-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729
id doaj-d792b5c057bb4f3eab53cba0f37b033b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d792b5c057bb4f3eab53cba0f37b033b2020-11-24T22:31:14ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272003-05-0142716Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]Thomas Döbler0Universität HohenheimIn 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical evaluations and examples of the filmmaking process, the practical, stylistic and aesthetic conventions of scientific filmmaking are scrutinised. With this evaluation, the authors critically interrogate and question scientific film's dual aspiration of being an entertaining and scientific media at the same time. Ranging from the personal account of filmmakers and their experience of co-operating with broadcasters to the analysis of different aspects and developing standards of scientific film, different types of readers are addressed. While integrating external discourses about authenticity and the possibility of visualising societal issues in a world that is more and more dominated by media content, the individual contributions are aimed at TV journalists, filmmakers and researchers or students in the area of cultural discourse. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030232http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729scientific film and televisionfilm theorydocumentaryvisual discourses
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Döbler
spellingShingle Thomas Döbler
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
scientific film and television
film theory
documentary
visual discourses
author_facet Thomas Döbler
author_sort Thomas Döbler
title Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
title_short Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
title_full Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
title_fullStr Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
title_full_unstemmed Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
title_sort review: edmund ballhaus (ed.) (2001). kulturwissenschaft, film und öffentlichkeit [cultural science, film, and public]
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2003-05-01
description In 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical evaluations and examples of the filmmaking process, the practical, stylistic and aesthetic conventions of scientific filmmaking are scrutinised. With this evaluation, the authors critically interrogate and question scientific film's dual aspiration of being an entertaining and scientific media at the same time. Ranging from the personal account of filmmakers and their experience of co-operating with broadcasters to the analysis of different aspects and developing standards of scientific film, different types of readers are addressed. While integrating external discourses about authenticity and the possibility of visualising societal issues in a world that is more and more dominated by media content, the individual contributions are aimed at TV journalists, filmmakers and researchers or students in the area of cultural discourse. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030232
topic scientific film and television
film theory
documentary
visual discourses
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasdobler reviewedmundballhaused2001kulturwissenschaftfilmundoffentlichkeitculturalsciencefilmandpublic
_version_ 1725738166646734848