Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]
In 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical eva...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2003-05-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729 |
id |
doaj-d792b5c057bb4f3eab53cba0f37b033b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d792b5c057bb4f3eab53cba0f37b033b2020-11-24T22:31:14ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272003-05-0142716Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public]Thomas Döbler0Universität HohenheimIn 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical evaluations and examples of the filmmaking process, the practical, stylistic and aesthetic conventions of scientific filmmaking are scrutinised. With this evaluation, the authors critically interrogate and question scientific film's dual aspiration of being an entertaining and scientific media at the same time. Ranging from the personal account of filmmakers and their experience of co-operating with broadcasters to the analysis of different aspects and developing standards of scientific film, different types of readers are addressed. While integrating external discourses about authenticity and the possibility of visualising societal issues in a world that is more and more dominated by media content, the individual contributions are aimed at TV journalists, filmmakers and researchers or students in the area of cultural discourse. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030232http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729scientific film and televisionfilm theorydocumentaryvisual discourses |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Döbler |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Döbler Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] Forum: Qualitative Social Research scientific film and television film theory documentary visual discourses |
author_facet |
Thomas Döbler |
author_sort |
Thomas Döbler |
title |
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] |
title_short |
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] |
title_full |
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] |
title_fullStr |
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review: Edmund Ballhaus (Ed.) (2001). Kulturwissenschaft, Film und Öffentlichkeit [Cultural Science, Film, and Public] |
title_sort |
review: edmund ballhaus (ed.) (2001). kulturwissenschaft, film und öffentlichkeit [cultural science, film, and public] |
publisher |
FQS |
series |
Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
issn |
1438-5627 |
publishDate |
2003-05-01 |
description |
In 18 separate contributions, arranged into four thematic blocks, this book outlines central practical and theoretical issues about scientific film and filmmaking. The scope and diversity of the issue is highlighted by employing a variety of perspectives on the subject. In a range of theoretical evaluations and examples of the filmmaking process, the practical, stylistic and aesthetic conventions of scientific filmmaking are scrutinised. With this evaluation, the authors critically interrogate and question scientific film's dual aspiration of being an entertaining and scientific media at the same time. Ranging from the personal account of filmmakers and their experience of co-operating with broadcasters to the analysis of different aspects and developing standards of scientific film, different types of readers are addressed. While integrating external discourses about authenticity and the possibility of visualising societal issues in a world that is more and more dominated by media content, the individual contributions are aimed at TV journalists, filmmakers and researchers or students in the area of cultural discourse.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030232 |
topic |
scientific film and television film theory documentary visual discourses |
url |
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/729 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomasdobler reviewedmundballhaused2001kulturwissenschaftfilmundoffentlichkeitculturalsciencefilmandpublic |
_version_ |
1725738166646734848 |