Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?

European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sipponen M., Mitchell M., Vanberg J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2010-11-01
Series:Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032
id doaj-d7779eea4bca429c8d33f339034c0126
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7779eea4bca429c8d33f339034c01262020-11-24T22:51:53ZengEDP SciencesKnowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems1961-95022010-11-0103990610.1051/kmae/2010032kmae100024Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?Sipponen M.0Mitchell M.1Vanberg J.2Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central FinlandCentre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central FinlandCentre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central Finland European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore institutions such as property rights regimes, have a profound influence on the prerequisites to carry out commercial inland fisheries. We examined whether two main property right regimes, public or private, have alleviated commercial inland fishers’ access to fishing grounds in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission, EIFAC. Public ownership prevailed in two countries out of three. Commercial inland catch and employment (number of fishers) for countries with mostly public ownership were nearly six times greater than for those with mostly private ownership. Ratios of both commercial inland catch and employment to inland water area were over nine times greater for countries were fisheries were publicly managed in comparison with privately managed fisheries. This outcome contradicts the presumption of privatisation of fishing rights as a tool to increase efficiency of commercial utilisation of inland water fish resources. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032inland fisheriesproperty rightsinstitutionsEurope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sipponen M.
Mitchell M.
Vanberg J.
spellingShingle Sipponen M.
Mitchell M.
Vanberg J.
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
inland fisheries
property rights
institutions
Europe
author_facet Sipponen M.
Mitchell M.
Vanberg J.
author_sort Sipponen M.
title Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
title_short Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
title_full Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
title_fullStr Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
title_full_unstemmed Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
title_sort does a property rights regime affect the outcome of european inland commercial fisheries?
publisher EDP Sciences
series Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
issn 1961-9502
publishDate 2010-11-01
description European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore institutions such as property rights regimes, have a profound influence on the prerequisites to carry out commercial inland fisheries. We examined whether two main property right regimes, public or private, have alleviated commercial inland fishers’ access to fishing grounds in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission, EIFAC. Public ownership prevailed in two countries out of three. Commercial inland catch and employment (number of fishers) for countries with mostly public ownership were nearly six times greater than for those with mostly private ownership. Ratios of both commercial inland catch and employment to inland water area were over nine times greater for countries were fisheries were publicly managed in comparison with privately managed fisheries. This outcome contradicts the presumption of privatisation of fishing rights as a tool to increase efficiency of commercial utilisation of inland water fish resources.
topic inland fisheries
property rights
institutions
Europe
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032
work_keys_str_mv AT sipponenm doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries
AT mitchellm doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries
AT vanbergj doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries
_version_ 1725668375020961792