Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?
European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2010-11-01
|
Series: | Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032 |
id |
doaj-d7779eea4bca429c8d33f339034c0126 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d7779eea4bca429c8d33f339034c01262020-11-24T22:51:53ZengEDP SciencesKnowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems1961-95022010-11-0103990610.1051/kmae/2010032kmae100024Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries?Sipponen M.0Mitchell M.1Vanberg J.2Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central FinlandCentre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central FinlandCentre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Central Finland European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore institutions such as property rights regimes, have a profound influence on the prerequisites to carry out commercial inland fisheries. We examined whether two main property right regimes, public or private, have alleviated commercial inland fishers’ access to fishing grounds in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission, EIFAC. Public ownership prevailed in two countries out of three. Commercial inland catch and employment (number of fishers) for countries with mostly public ownership were nearly six times greater than for those with mostly private ownership. Ratios of both commercial inland catch and employment to inland water area were over nine times greater for countries were fisheries were publicly managed in comparison with privately managed fisheries. This outcome contradicts the presumption of privatisation of fishing rights as a tool to increase efficiency of commercial utilisation of inland water fish resources. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032inland fisheriesproperty rightsinstitutionsEurope |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sipponen M. Mitchell M. Vanberg J. |
spellingShingle |
Sipponen M. Mitchell M. Vanberg J. Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems inland fisheries property rights institutions Europe |
author_facet |
Sipponen M. Mitchell M. Vanberg J. |
author_sort |
Sipponen M. |
title |
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? |
title_short |
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? |
title_full |
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? |
title_fullStr |
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does a property rights regime affect the outcome of European inland commercial fisheries? |
title_sort |
does a property rights regime affect the outcome of european inland commercial fisheries? |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems |
issn |
1961-9502 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
European inland commercial fisheries exhibit a wide spectrum of fishing modes, and have
experienced major changes over recent decades. A peculiar feature of inland fisheries is
the deep dependence on resources usually owned by someone else than a fisher. Therefore
institutions such as property rights regimes, have a profound influence on the
prerequisites to carry out commercial inland fisheries. We examined whether two main
property right regimes, public or private, have alleviated commercial inland fishers’
access to fishing grounds in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory
Commission, EIFAC. Public ownership prevailed in two countries out of three. Commercial
inland catch and employment (number of fishers) for countries with mostly public ownership
were nearly six times greater than for those with mostly private ownership. Ratios of both
commercial inland catch and employment to inland water area were over nine times greater
for countries were fisheries were publicly managed in comparison with privately managed
fisheries. This outcome contradicts the presumption of privatisation of fishing rights as
a tool to increase efficiency of commercial utilisation of inland water fish resources.
|
topic |
inland fisheries property rights institutions Europe |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010032 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sipponenm doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries AT mitchellm doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries AT vanbergj doesapropertyrightsregimeaffecttheoutcomeofeuropeaninlandcommercialfisheries |
_version_ |
1725668375020961792 |