The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula

With dialogue on the Korean peninsula stagnating and the United States preoccupied with the upcoming presidential election later this year, any major progress towards resolving the crisis in the region is unlikely over the next few months. In such a situation, the guiding principle is “do no harm” –...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anton Khlopkov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1751553
id doaj-d75c3b31b998480083f08df145e32c03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d75c3b31b998480083f08df145e32c032020-11-25T03:24:00ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament2575-16542020-01-013118318610.1080/25751654.2020.17515531751553The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean PeninsulaAnton Khlopkov0Center for Energy and Security Studies (CENESS)With dialogue on the Korean peninsula stagnating and the United States preoccupied with the upcoming presidential election later this year, any major progress towards resolving the crisis in the region is unlikely over the next few months. In such a situation, the guiding principle is “do no harm” – in other words, the priority should be to avoid any escalation that would pose additional obstacles for new active diplomatic efforts. In this context, with regard to a future diplomatic re-opening on the Korean peninsula, a multilateral approach appears to be the most promising as it can make the negotiating process more flexible and the potential progress more sustainable. One of the possible dialogue formats is P3 + 3, involving three permanent Security Council members (China, Russia, and the United States) and three regional powers (the DPRK, ROK, and Japan). Of the latter trio, Tokyo has yet to prove its relevance for this format and its readiness to play a positive role in the negotiating process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1751553denuclearizationhanoi summitkorean peninsulanuclear test moratoriump3+3summitry process
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anton Khlopkov
spellingShingle Anton Khlopkov
The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
denuclearization
hanoi summit
korean peninsula
nuclear test moratorium
p3+3
summitry process
author_facet Anton Khlopkov
author_sort Anton Khlopkov
title The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
title_short The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
title_full The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
title_fullStr The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
title_full_unstemmed The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
title_sort 2018-2019 summitry process and prospects for denuclearization of the korean peninsula
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
issn 2575-1654
publishDate 2020-01-01
description With dialogue on the Korean peninsula stagnating and the United States preoccupied with the upcoming presidential election later this year, any major progress towards resolving the crisis in the region is unlikely over the next few months. In such a situation, the guiding principle is “do no harm” – in other words, the priority should be to avoid any escalation that would pose additional obstacles for new active diplomatic efforts. In this context, with regard to a future diplomatic re-opening on the Korean peninsula, a multilateral approach appears to be the most promising as it can make the negotiating process more flexible and the potential progress more sustainable. One of the possible dialogue formats is P3 + 3, involving three permanent Security Council members (China, Russia, and the United States) and three regional powers (the DPRK, ROK, and Japan). Of the latter trio, Tokyo has yet to prove its relevance for this format and its readiness to play a positive role in the negotiating process.
topic denuclearization
hanoi summit
korean peninsula
nuclear test moratorium
p3+3
summitry process
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1751553
work_keys_str_mv AT antonkhlopkov the20182019summitryprocessandprospectsfordenuclearizationofthekoreanpeninsula
AT antonkhlopkov 20182019summitryprocessandprospectsfordenuclearizationofthekoreanpeninsula
_version_ 1724604126659084288