Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts

Typological studies of place assimilation show that nasal consonants are more likely to assimilate in place than oral stops (Cho, 1990; Jun, 1995, 2004; Mohanan, 1993). Jun (1995, 2004) argues that this typological asymmetry derives from a difference in the perceptibility of the place contrasts in n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kawahara Shigeto, Garvey Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2014-10-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2014.1.issue-1/opli-2014-0002/opli-2014-0002.xml?format=INT
id doaj-d759cc8e44af42489484f325b4fa9adb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d759cc8e44af42489484f325b4fa9adb2021-10-02T07:37:00ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692014-10-011110.2478/opli-2014-0002opli-2014-0002Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrastsKawahara Shigeto0Garvey Kelly1Keio University, Tokyo, JapanBoston UniversityTypological studies of place assimilation show that nasal consonants are more likely to assimilate in place than oral stops (Cho, 1990; Jun, 1995, 2004; Mohanan, 1993). Jun (1995, 2004) argues that this typological asymmetry derives from a difference in the perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants and in oral stops. Since the place contrasts in nasals are perceptually weaker than the place contrasts in oral stops, speakers are more willing to neutralize the former. However, the previous phonetic and psycholinguistic experiments do not provide unambiguous evidence for the weaker perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants (Hura et al., 1992; Mohr & Wang, 1968; Pols, 1983; Winters, 2002). To offer additional experimental findings bearing on this debate, this paper reports two similarity judgment experiments and two identification experiments in noise, which all show the lower perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants in coda. The results are compatible with— and thus can lend support to—Jun’s (1995, 2004) idea that the asymmetry in place assimilation may result from a difference in the perceptibility of place contrasts.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2014.1.issue-1/opli-2014-0002/opli-2014-0002.xml?format=INTnasal place assimilation speech perceptionperceptibility P-Map
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kawahara Shigeto
Garvey Kelly
spellingShingle Kawahara Shigeto
Garvey Kelly
Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
Open Linguistics
nasal place assimilation
speech perception
perceptibility
P-Map
author_facet Kawahara Shigeto
Garvey Kelly
author_sort Kawahara Shigeto
title Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
title_short Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
title_full Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
title_fullStr Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
title_full_unstemmed Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
title_sort nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Typological studies of place assimilation show that nasal consonants are more likely to assimilate in place than oral stops (Cho, 1990; Jun, 1995, 2004; Mohanan, 1993). Jun (1995, 2004) argues that this typological asymmetry derives from a difference in the perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants and in oral stops. Since the place contrasts in nasals are perceptually weaker than the place contrasts in oral stops, speakers are more willing to neutralize the former. However, the previous phonetic and psycholinguistic experiments do not provide unambiguous evidence for the weaker perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants (Hura et al., 1992; Mohr & Wang, 1968; Pols, 1983; Winters, 2002). To offer additional experimental findings bearing on this debate, this paper reports two similarity judgment experiments and two identification experiments in noise, which all show the lower perceptibility of the place contrasts in nasal consonants in coda. The results are compatible with— and thus can lend support to—Jun’s (1995, 2004) idea that the asymmetry in place assimilation may result from a difference in the perceptibility of place contrasts.
topic nasal place assimilation
speech perception
perceptibility
P-Map
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2014.1.issue-1/opli-2014-0002/opli-2014-0002.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaharashigeto nasalplaceassimilationandtheperceptibilityofplacecontrasts
AT garveykelly nasalplaceassimilationandtheperceptibilityofplacecontrasts
_version_ 1716857478689325056