Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of monocortical and bicortical implant placement of external hexagon connection in the anterior region of the maxilla by 3D finite element analysis (FEA). 3D models were simulated to represent a bone block of anterior region of the maxill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fellippo Ramos Verri, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida, Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri, Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/321528
id doaj-d74e227d51ad4387849d2d4919c8fb66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d74e227d51ad4387849d2d4919c8fb662020-11-25T01:18:05ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/321528321528Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone AnchoragesFellippo Ramos Verri0Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior1Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida2Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri3Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista4Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos5Pedro Yoshito Noritomi6Eduardo Piza Pellizzer7Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Sacred Heart (USC), Bauru, SP, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Pediatric and Community Dentistry, Dental School of Araçatuba, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 15015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilRenato Archer Research Center (CTI), Campinas, SP, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP, BrazilThe aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of monocortical and bicortical implant placement of external hexagon connection in the anterior region of the maxilla by 3D finite element analysis (FEA). 3D models were simulated to represent a bone block of anterior region of the maxilla containing an implant (4.0 × 10.0 mm) and an implant-supported cemented metalloceramic crown of the central incisor. Different techniques were tested (monocortical, bicortical, and bicortical associated with nasal floor elevation). FEA was performed in FEMAP/NeiNastran software using loads of 178 N at 0°, 30°, and 60° in relation to implant long axis. The von Mises, maximum principal stress, and displacement maps were plotted for evaluation. Similar stress patterns were observed for all models. Oblique loads increased the stress concentration on fixation screws and in the cervical area of the implants and bone around them. Bicortical technique showed less movement tendency in the implant and its components. Cortical bone of apical region showed increase of stress concentration for bicortical techniques. Within the limitations of this study, oblique loading increased the stress concentrations for all techniques. Moreover, bicortical techniques showed the best biomechanical behavior compared with monocortical technique in the anterior maxillary area.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/321528
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fellippo Ramos Verri
Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior
Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida
Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
Pedro Yoshito Noritomi
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
spellingShingle Fellippo Ramos Verri
Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior
Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida
Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
Pedro Yoshito Noritomi
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Fellippo Ramos Verri
Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior
Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida
Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
Pedro Yoshito Noritomi
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
author_sort Fellippo Ramos Verri
title Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
title_short Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
title_full Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages
title_sort three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior single implant-supported prostheses with different bone anchorages
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of monocortical and bicortical implant placement of external hexagon connection in the anterior region of the maxilla by 3D finite element analysis (FEA). 3D models were simulated to represent a bone block of anterior region of the maxilla containing an implant (4.0 × 10.0 mm) and an implant-supported cemented metalloceramic crown of the central incisor. Different techniques were tested (monocortical, bicortical, and bicortical associated with nasal floor elevation). FEA was performed in FEMAP/NeiNastran software using loads of 178 N at 0°, 30°, and 60° in relation to implant long axis. The von Mises, maximum principal stress, and displacement maps were plotted for evaluation. Similar stress patterns were observed for all models. Oblique loads increased the stress concentration on fixation screws and in the cervical area of the implants and bone around them. Bicortical technique showed less movement tendency in the implant and its components. Cortical bone of apical region showed increase of stress concentration for bicortical techniques. Within the limitations of this study, oblique loading increased the stress concentrations for all techniques. Moreover, bicortical techniques showed the best biomechanical behavior compared with monocortical technique in the anterior maxillary area.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/321528
work_keys_str_mv AT fellipporamosverri threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT joelferreirasantiagojunior threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT danielaugustodefariaalmeida threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT anacarolinegoncalesverri threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT victoreduardodesouzabatista threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT cleidielaparecidoaraujolemos threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT pedroyoshitonoritomi threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
AT eduardopizapellizzer threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriorsingleimplantsupportedprostheseswithdifferentboneanchorages
_version_ 1725143857378623488