Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations

Background: The concept of biological evolution has long been accepted as a palatable theory aiming at explaining how life began and how creatures diverged so widely along the life span of the earth. Meticulous analysis and criticism of the different postulations of this concept, however, reveals th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Saad Zaghloul Salem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111086301300092X
id doaj-d740944f9d0045998903de9547939414
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d740944f9d0045998903de95479394142020-11-25T02:36:01ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics1110-86302014-01-011511510.1016/j.ejmhg.2013.11.004Biological evolution: Some genetic considerationsMohammad Saad Zaghloul SalemBackground: The concept of biological evolution has long been accepted as a palatable theory aiming at explaining how life began and how creatures diverged so widely along the life span of the earth. Meticulous analysis and criticism of the different postulations of this concept, however, reveals that evolution is an illogic concept based on theoretical hypotheses that can never be tested. Creation, on the other hand, represents the other side of the coin, and up till now debates confronting creation versus evolution are still occupying much interest of atheist as well as of believer biologists. Aim of this article: The motive for accepting the concept of evolution by most biologists, stems solely from their atheism and their saying that creation can neither be experimented nor validated, the same criticism directed against their assumptions regarding the basic aspects of evolution. This article, through analysis, criticism and reevaluation of some relevant genetic considerations that have long been traditionally considered as observations in support of the concept of evolution, viz. genetic memory and evolutionary variations, genomic adaptations to stress and evolution, comparative genomics and natural versus targeted selection, tries to elucidate and reveal some insensible assumptions embodied within the core ideas of evolution that stand in direct controversy with many well-known facts regarding the structure, function and behavior of living matter. Conclusion: Natural selection might be observed in nature but not in life. The concept of biological evolution is an illogic and insensible hypothesis since it stands in direct contradiction with our current knowledge regarding the behavior as well as the structural and functional characteristics of the human genome and human proteome. Additionally, almost all basic postulations of this concept can neither be tested nor imitated for experimentation, which is a prerequisite for acceptance and validation of any scientific hypotheses.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111086301300092XEvolutionCreationNatural selectionCreative selectionBiological adaptationEvolutionary diversityBiomoleculesHuman genomeHuman proteomePhylogenetic divergence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Saad Zaghloul Salem
spellingShingle Mohammad Saad Zaghloul Salem
Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Evolution
Creation
Natural selection
Creative selection
Biological adaptation
Evolutionary diversity
Biomolecules
Human genome
Human proteome
Phylogenetic divergence
author_facet Mohammad Saad Zaghloul Salem
author_sort Mohammad Saad Zaghloul Salem
title Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
title_short Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
title_full Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
title_fullStr Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
title_full_unstemmed Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations
title_sort biological evolution: some genetic considerations
publisher SpringerOpen
series Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
issn 1110-8630
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: The concept of biological evolution has long been accepted as a palatable theory aiming at explaining how life began and how creatures diverged so widely along the life span of the earth. Meticulous analysis and criticism of the different postulations of this concept, however, reveals that evolution is an illogic concept based on theoretical hypotheses that can never be tested. Creation, on the other hand, represents the other side of the coin, and up till now debates confronting creation versus evolution are still occupying much interest of atheist as well as of believer biologists. Aim of this article: The motive for accepting the concept of evolution by most biologists, stems solely from their atheism and their saying that creation can neither be experimented nor validated, the same criticism directed against their assumptions regarding the basic aspects of evolution. This article, through analysis, criticism and reevaluation of some relevant genetic considerations that have long been traditionally considered as observations in support of the concept of evolution, viz. genetic memory and evolutionary variations, genomic adaptations to stress and evolution, comparative genomics and natural versus targeted selection, tries to elucidate and reveal some insensible assumptions embodied within the core ideas of evolution that stand in direct controversy with many well-known facts regarding the structure, function and behavior of living matter. Conclusion: Natural selection might be observed in nature but not in life. The concept of biological evolution is an illogic and insensible hypothesis since it stands in direct contradiction with our current knowledge regarding the behavior as well as the structural and functional characteristics of the human genome and human proteome. Additionally, almost all basic postulations of this concept can neither be tested nor imitated for experimentation, which is a prerequisite for acceptance and validation of any scientific hypotheses.
topic Evolution
Creation
Natural selection
Creative selection
Biological adaptation
Evolutionary diversity
Biomolecules
Human genome
Human proteome
Phylogenetic divergence
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111086301300092X
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadsaadzaghloulsalem biologicalevolutionsomegeneticconsiderations
_version_ 1724801914044940288