Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications

Introduction: Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. They strongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease. The purpose of the present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henrique Donato, Luísa Andrade, Nina Bastati, Augusta Cipriano, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ordem dos Médicos 2018-09-01
Series:Acta Médica Portuguesa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10259
id doaj-d7348f9c5db5425d93ae1b3c7ce76932
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7348f9c5db5425d93ae1b3c7ce769322020-11-25T01:28:36ZengOrdem dos MédicosActa Médica Portuguesa0870-399X1646-07582018-09-0131947047710.20344/amp.102594752Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical ImplicationsHenrique Donato0Luísa Andrade1Nina Bastati2Augusta Cipriano3Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah4Filipe Caseiro-Alves5Imaging Department. Faculty of Medicine. University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC). Coimbra.Imaging Department. Faculty of Medicine. University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC). Coimbra.Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy. Medical University of Vienna. General Hospital of Vienna (AKH). Vienna.Pathology Department. University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC). Coimbra.Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy. Medical University of Vienna. General Hospital of Vienna (AKH). Vienna.Imaging Department. Faculty of Medicine. University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC). Coimbra.Introduction: Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. They strongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease. The purpose of the present study was to describe the key imaging features of these lesions and compare them with a control arm of focal nodular hyperplasia. Material and Methods: A blinded consensus review of liver magnetic resonance consisting of 26 cases of multiacinar regenerative nodules and 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia was performed. Lesion size, shape, margins, structure, T1 and T2 signal intensity, diffusion and contrast-enhanced features (including hepatobiliary phase), presence of a central scar and of a peripheral hypointense rim were compared between the two groups. Results: Significant differences between multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia included size (median 2.35 cm, IQR: 2.13, vs 6.00 cm, IQR: 5.20, respectively, p < 0.001), presence of a peripheral hypointense rim after contrast (n = 9 vs n = 2 cases, p = 0.038) and of a central scar (n = 9 vs n = 20, p = 0.002). There were no other significant differences. Discussion: Overall multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia have very similar imaging features but lack of a central scar and presence of a hypointense rim should suggest a diagnosis of multiacinar regenerative nodules. Conclusions: Recognition of the imaging findings of multiacinar regenerative nodules can explain some atypical cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. They may also be the trigger to investigate an unsuspected underlying liver vascular abnormality.https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10259Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryFocal Nodular HyperplasiaLiver DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsLiver RegenerationMagnetic Resonance Imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henrique Donato
Luísa Andrade
Nina Bastati
Augusta Cipriano
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Filipe Caseiro-Alves
spellingShingle Henrique Donato
Luísa Andrade
Nina Bastati
Augusta Cipriano
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
Acta Médica Portuguesa
Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
Liver Diseases
Liver Neoplasms
Liver Regeneration
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
author_facet Henrique Donato
Luísa Andrade
Nina Bastati
Augusta Cipriano
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Filipe Caseiro-Alves
author_sort Henrique Donato
title Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
title_short Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
title_full Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
title_fullStr Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
title_full_unstemmed Liver Multiacinar Regenerative Nodules: Imaging Findings and Clinical Implications
title_sort liver multiacinar regenerative nodules: imaging findings and clinical implications
publisher Ordem dos Médicos
series Acta Médica Portuguesa
issn 0870-399X
1646-0758
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Introduction: Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. They strongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease. The purpose of the present study was to describe the key imaging features of these lesions and compare them with a control arm of focal nodular hyperplasia. Material and Methods: A blinded consensus review of liver magnetic resonance consisting of 26 cases of multiacinar regenerative nodules and 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia was performed. Lesion size, shape, margins, structure, T1 and T2 signal intensity, diffusion and contrast-enhanced features (including hepatobiliary phase), presence of a central scar and of a peripheral hypointense rim were compared between the two groups. Results: Significant differences between multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia included size (median 2.35 cm, IQR: 2.13, vs 6.00 cm, IQR: 5.20, respectively, p < 0.001), presence of a peripheral hypointense rim after contrast (n = 9 vs n = 2 cases, p = 0.038) and of a central scar (n = 9 vs n = 20, p = 0.002). There were no other significant differences. Discussion: Overall multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia have very similar imaging features but lack of a central scar and presence of a hypointense rim should suggest a diagnosis of multiacinar regenerative nodules. Conclusions: Recognition of the imaging findings of multiacinar regenerative nodules can explain some atypical cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. They may also be the trigger to investigate an unsuspected underlying liver vascular abnormality.
topic Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
Liver Diseases
Liver Neoplasms
Liver Regeneration
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10259
work_keys_str_mv AT henriquedonato livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
AT luisaandrade livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
AT ninabastati livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
AT augustacipriano livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
AT ahmedbassalamah livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
AT filipecaseiroalves livermultiacinarregenerativenodulesimagingfindingsandclinicalimplications
_version_ 1725100591902883840