Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant

Although seen as a ‘Nobles’ Covenant’, the National Covenant was always overshadowed by issues surrounding the participation of the vulgar, or the common people, in the process. It was a situation in which social disorder was never far away, both for the Royalists and for the Covenanters. This iss...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kirsteen Marie MacKenzie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scottish Studies Foundation 2011-09-01
Series:International Review of Scottish Studies
Online Access:https://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/index.php/irss/article/view/1445
id doaj-d73204282eed4817942d2e113e67bd9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d73204282eed4817942d2e113e67bd9b2020-11-25T03:55:56ZengScottish Studies FoundationInternational Review of Scottish Studies1923-57551923-57632011-09-013610.21083/irss.v36i0.14451028Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National CovenantKirsteen Marie MacKenzie0University of AberdeenAlthough seen as a ‘Nobles’ Covenant’, the National Covenant was always overshadowed by issues surrounding the participation of the vulgar, or the common people, in the process. It was a situation in which social disorder was never far away, both for the Royalists and for the Covenanters. This issue and the wider concerns over law and order help us to understand more clearly the origins of the King’s Covenant and confirms that the King’s Covenant was not inspired by the Aberdeen Doctors but by the continuation of concerns over law and order. From the Covenanting perspective it is interesting to see how, at first, in order to legitimise their cause, they stepped away from the violence committed by their supporters and how, in the end, after being put in a legal corner by the Doctors, violence was justified on religious grounds. It is clear that the strength of the legal attack by the Doctors left the Covenanting leadership reeling and fearful of the King’s Covenant. Perhaps this allows us to see that the success of the Covenanting movement was due in part to Hamilton’s mistake over the Confession and the King’s Covenant was essentially a wasted opportunity to strike at the movement when it was on the defensive. Along with Sir Thomas Hope’s earlier statements, and the Covenanters success in dominating the General Assembly a few months later, the Covenanters were on an assured legal footing.https://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/index.php/irss/article/view/1445
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirsteen Marie MacKenzie
spellingShingle Kirsteen Marie MacKenzie
Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
International Review of Scottish Studies
author_facet Kirsteen Marie MacKenzie
author_sort Kirsteen Marie MacKenzie
title Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
title_short Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
title_full Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
title_fullStr Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
title_full_unstemmed Restoring the Nation? Hamilton and the Politics of the National Covenant
title_sort restoring the nation? hamilton and the politics of the national covenant
publisher Scottish Studies Foundation
series International Review of Scottish Studies
issn 1923-5755
1923-5763
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Although seen as a ‘Nobles’ Covenant’, the National Covenant was always overshadowed by issues surrounding the participation of the vulgar, or the common people, in the process. It was a situation in which social disorder was never far away, both for the Royalists and for the Covenanters. This issue and the wider concerns over law and order help us to understand more clearly the origins of the King’s Covenant and confirms that the King’s Covenant was not inspired by the Aberdeen Doctors but by the continuation of concerns over law and order. From the Covenanting perspective it is interesting to see how, at first, in order to legitimise their cause, they stepped away from the violence committed by their supporters and how, in the end, after being put in a legal corner by the Doctors, violence was justified on religious grounds. It is clear that the strength of the legal attack by the Doctors left the Covenanting leadership reeling and fearful of the King’s Covenant. Perhaps this allows us to see that the success of the Covenanting movement was due in part to Hamilton’s mistake over the Confession and the King’s Covenant was essentially a wasted opportunity to strike at the movement when it was on the defensive. Along with Sir Thomas Hope’s earlier statements, and the Covenanters success in dominating the General Assembly a few months later, the Covenanters were on an assured legal footing.
url https://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/index.php/irss/article/view/1445
work_keys_str_mv AT kirsteenmariemackenzie restoringthenationhamiltonandthepoliticsofthenationalcovenant
_version_ 1724467302983794688