Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?

The determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures at atomic resolution has improved understanding of cellular signaling and will accelerate the development of new drug candidates. However, experimental structures still remain unavailable for a majority of the GPCR family. GPCR struct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon Kapla, Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares, Flavio Ballante, Jana Selent, Jens Carlsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-05-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008936
id doaj-d723d0eb02b44b689478863194ed2051
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d723d0eb02b44b689478863194ed20512021-06-19T05:32:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582021-05-01175e100893610.1371/journal.pcbi.1008936Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?Jon KaplaIsmael Rodríguez-EspigaresFlavio BallanteJana SelentJens CarlssonThe determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures at atomic resolution has improved understanding of cellular signaling and will accelerate the development of new drug candidates. However, experimental structures still remain unavailable for a majority of the GPCR family. GPCR structures and their interactions with ligands can also be modelled computationally, but such predictions have limited accuracy. In this work, we explored if molecular dynamics (MD) simulations could be used to refine the accuracy of in silico models of receptor-ligand complexes that were submitted to a community-wide assessment of GPCR structure prediction (GPCR Dock). Two simulation protocols were used to refine 30 models of the D3 dopamine receptor (D3R) in complex with an antagonist. Close to 60 μs of simulation time was generated and the resulting MD refined models were compared to a D3R crystal structure. In the MD simulations, the receptor models generally drifted further away from the crystal structure conformation. However, MD refinement was able to improve the accuracy of the ligand binding mode. The best refinement protocol improved agreement with the experimentally observed ligand binding mode for a majority of the models. Receptor structures with improved virtual screening performance, which was assessed by molecular docking of ligands and decoys, could also be identified among the MD refined models. Application of weak restraints to the transmembrane helixes in the MD simulations further improved predictions of the ligand binding mode and second extracellular loop. These results provide guidelines for application of MD refinement in prediction of GPCR-ligand complexes and directions for further method development.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008936
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jon Kapla
Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares
Flavio Ballante
Jana Selent
Jens Carlsson
spellingShingle Jon Kapla
Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares
Flavio Ballante
Jana Selent
Jens Carlsson
Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Jon Kapla
Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares
Flavio Ballante
Jana Selent
Jens Carlsson
author_sort Jon Kapla
title Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
title_short Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
title_full Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
title_fullStr Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
title_full_unstemmed Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
title_sort can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of gpcr models?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures at atomic resolution has improved understanding of cellular signaling and will accelerate the development of new drug candidates. However, experimental structures still remain unavailable for a majority of the GPCR family. GPCR structures and their interactions with ligands can also be modelled computationally, but such predictions have limited accuracy. In this work, we explored if molecular dynamics (MD) simulations could be used to refine the accuracy of in silico models of receptor-ligand complexes that were submitted to a community-wide assessment of GPCR structure prediction (GPCR Dock). Two simulation protocols were used to refine 30 models of the D3 dopamine receptor (D3R) in complex with an antagonist. Close to 60 μs of simulation time was generated and the resulting MD refined models were compared to a D3R crystal structure. In the MD simulations, the receptor models generally drifted further away from the crystal structure conformation. However, MD refinement was able to improve the accuracy of the ligand binding mode. The best refinement protocol improved agreement with the experimentally observed ligand binding mode for a majority of the models. Receptor structures with improved virtual screening performance, which was assessed by molecular docking of ligands and decoys, could also be identified among the MD refined models. Application of weak restraints to the transmembrane helixes in the MD simulations further improved predictions of the ligand binding mode and second extracellular loop. These results provide guidelines for application of MD refinement in prediction of GPCR-ligand complexes and directions for further method development.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008936
work_keys_str_mv AT jonkapla canmoleculardynamicssimulationsimprovethestructuralaccuracyandvirtualscreeningperformanceofgpcrmodels
AT ismaelrodriguezespigares canmoleculardynamicssimulationsimprovethestructuralaccuracyandvirtualscreeningperformanceofgpcrmodels
AT flavioballante canmoleculardynamicssimulationsimprovethestructuralaccuracyandvirtualscreeningperformanceofgpcrmodels
AT janaselent canmoleculardynamicssimulationsimprovethestructuralaccuracyandvirtualscreeningperformanceofgpcrmodels
AT jenscarlsson canmoleculardynamicssimulationsimprovethestructuralaccuracyandvirtualscreeningperformanceofgpcrmodels
_version_ 1721371301404213248