Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves

In qualitative research, the importance of knowledge production is illustrated by the confidence in logos, that still flags. Although there is significant attention for approaches that are inclusive to the body, affect and non-rational dimensions, these approaches still aim to generate understanding...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merel Visse, Finn Thorbjørn Hansen, Carlo J. W. Leget
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-11-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958975
id doaj-d717a9dfedfd4de09c288b8d16001085
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d717a9dfedfd4de09c288b8d160010852020-11-25T03:58:14ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692020-11-011910.1177/1609406920958975Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions ThemselvesMerel Visse0Finn Thorbjørn Hansen1Carlo J. W. Leget2 Department of Medical and Health Humanities, Drew University, Madison, NJ, USA Professor of Philosophy and Dialogical Praxis, Center for Dialogue and Organization, Institute for Communication, Aalborg University, Denmark Department of Care Ethics, , Utrecht, the NetherlandsIn qualitative research, the importance of knowledge production is illustrated by the confidence in logos, that still flags. Although there is significant attention for approaches that are inclusive to the body, affect and non-rational dimensions, these approaches still aim to generate understandings by the appropriation of knowledge. This paper critiques that view and proposes another view of inquiry that centers the praxis of living the questions instead. Here, research is seen as a gradual unfolding of a process. The quest that belongs with this view of research is concerned with how to make space for life phenomena to emerge. We frame this as apophatic inquiry, a non-methodology, as it is not a matter of applying activities in a set of steps. For apophatic inquiry, a process of unknowing and wonder is imperative. The paper discusses how to foster a triadic inter-beingness in a research praxis that fosters the calling forth of and reflection on phenomena. For that, the researcher nurtures awareness and reflection on a triadic sphere of three closely connected spaces: the Inner Space, the Aesthetic Space, and the Wondrous Space. By being receptive to the impressions that unfold within and between these spaces, the research becomes part of a process of living a question in real-time. Thus, living and life itself become the heart of the research.https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958975
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Merel Visse
Finn Thorbjørn Hansen
Carlo J. W. Leget
spellingShingle Merel Visse
Finn Thorbjørn Hansen
Carlo J. W. Leget
Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
author_facet Merel Visse
Finn Thorbjørn Hansen
Carlo J. W. Leget
author_sort Merel Visse
title Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
title_short Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
title_full Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
title_fullStr Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
title_full_unstemmed Apophatic Inquiry: Living the Questions Themselves
title_sort apophatic inquiry: living the questions themselves
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
issn 1609-4069
publishDate 2020-11-01
description In qualitative research, the importance of knowledge production is illustrated by the confidence in logos, that still flags. Although there is significant attention for approaches that are inclusive to the body, affect and non-rational dimensions, these approaches still aim to generate understandings by the appropriation of knowledge. This paper critiques that view and proposes another view of inquiry that centers the praxis of living the questions instead. Here, research is seen as a gradual unfolding of a process. The quest that belongs with this view of research is concerned with how to make space for life phenomena to emerge. We frame this as apophatic inquiry, a non-methodology, as it is not a matter of applying activities in a set of steps. For apophatic inquiry, a process of unknowing and wonder is imperative. The paper discusses how to foster a triadic inter-beingness in a research praxis that fosters the calling forth of and reflection on phenomena. For that, the researcher nurtures awareness and reflection on a triadic sphere of three closely connected spaces: the Inner Space, the Aesthetic Space, and the Wondrous Space. By being receptive to the impressions that unfold within and between these spaces, the research becomes part of a process of living a question in real-time. Thus, living and life itself become the heart of the research.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958975
work_keys_str_mv AT merelvisse apophaticinquirylivingthequestionsthemselves
AT finnthorbjørnhansen apophaticinquirylivingthequestionsthemselves
AT carlojwleget apophaticinquirylivingthequestionsthemselves
_version_ 1724458405356109824