Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
This article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regiona...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Citizen Science: Theory and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310 |
id |
doaj-d70196f1ba8145aa80f2f87c0423debc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d70196f1ba8145aa80f2f87c0423debc2021-01-11T05:07:33ZengUbiquity PressCitizen Science: Theory and Practice2057-49912020-12-015110.5334/cstp.310105Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen ScienceEmily Oswald0Department of Education, University of OsloThis article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regional botanical society, experienced boundaries between their group’s practices and the citizen science project organized by a natural history museum, despite similar ways of working. Organizers and volunteers responded to boundary experiences by defining their respective practices and suggesting how project activities could be coordinated across boundaries. Findings from this study support practitioners’ efforts to implement citizen science projects that result in positive outcomes for organizers and volunteers by revealing how participation in a community of practice, such as a botanical society, affects volunteers’ engagement in citizen science. Suggestions are made for how project designs can be responsive to volunteers’ boundary experiences.https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310citizen sciencecommunity of practicenatural history museumsinteraction analysisbotanyboundary practices |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emily Oswald |
spellingShingle |
Emily Oswald Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science Citizen Science: Theory and Practice citizen science community of practice natural history museums interaction analysis botany boundary practices |
author_facet |
Emily Oswald |
author_sort |
Emily Oswald |
title |
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science |
title_short |
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science |
title_full |
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science |
title_fullStr |
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science |
title_sort |
getting to know other ways of knowing: boundary experiences in citizen science |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Citizen Science: Theory and Practice |
issn |
2057-4991 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regional botanical society, experienced boundaries between their group’s practices and the citizen science project organized by a natural history museum, despite similar ways of working. Organizers and volunteers responded to boundary experiences by defining their respective practices and suggesting how project activities could be coordinated across boundaries. Findings from this study support practitioners’ efforts to implement citizen science projects that result in positive outcomes for organizers and volunteers by revealing how participation in a community of practice, such as a botanical society, affects volunteers’ engagement in citizen science. Suggestions are made for how project designs can be responsive to volunteers’ boundary experiences. |
topic |
citizen science community of practice natural history museums interaction analysis botany boundary practices |
url |
https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emilyoswald gettingtoknowotherwaysofknowingboundaryexperiencesincitizenscience |
_version_ |
1724341590278799360 |