Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science

This article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emily Oswald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-12-01
Series:Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310
id doaj-d70196f1ba8145aa80f2f87c0423debc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d70196f1ba8145aa80f2f87c0423debc2021-01-11T05:07:33ZengUbiquity PressCitizen Science: Theory and Practice2057-49912020-12-015110.5334/cstp.310105Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen ScienceEmily Oswald0Department of Education, University of OsloThis article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regional botanical society, experienced boundaries between their group’s practices and the citizen science project organized by a natural history museum, despite similar ways of working. Organizers and volunteers responded to boundary experiences by defining their respective practices and suggesting how project activities could be coordinated across boundaries. Findings from this study support practitioners’ efforts to implement citizen science projects that result in positive outcomes for organizers and volunteers by revealing how participation in a community of practice, such as a botanical society, affects volunteers’ engagement in citizen science. Suggestions are made for how project designs can be responsive to volunteers’ boundary experiences.https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310citizen sciencecommunity of practicenatural history museumsinteraction analysisbotanyboundary practices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily Oswald
spellingShingle Emily Oswald
Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
citizen science
community of practice
natural history museums
interaction analysis
botany
boundary practices
author_facet Emily Oswald
author_sort Emily Oswald
title Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
title_short Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
title_full Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
title_fullStr Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
title_full_unstemmed Getting to Know Other Ways of Knowing: Boundary Experiences in Citizen Science
title_sort getting to know other ways of knowing: boundary experiences in citizen science
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
issn 2057-4991
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article uses the concept of boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) to explore why collaboration in citizen science is sometimes difficult. The case study focuses on collaboration between project organizers and project volunteers in a single citizen science project. The volunteers, from a regional botanical society, experienced boundaries between their group’s practices and the citizen science project organized by a natural history museum, despite similar ways of working. Organizers and volunteers responded to boundary experiences by defining their respective practices and suggesting how project activities could be coordinated across boundaries. Findings from this study support practitioners’ efforts to implement citizen science projects that result in positive outcomes for organizers and volunteers by revealing how participation in a community of practice, such as a botanical society, affects volunteers’ engagement in citizen science. Suggestions are made for how project designs can be responsive to volunteers’ boundary experiences.
topic citizen science
community of practice
natural history museums
interaction analysis
botany
boundary practices
url https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/310
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyoswald gettingtoknowotherwaysofknowingboundaryexperiencesincitizenscience
_version_ 1724341590278799360