Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.

Human history has been marked by social instability and conflict, often driven by the irreconcilability of opposing sets of beliefs, ideologies, and religious dogmas. The dynamics of belief systems has been studied mainly from two distinct perspectives, namely how cognitive biases lead to individual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathaniel Rodriguez, Johan Bollen, Yong-Yeol Ahn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5094740?pdf=render
id doaj-d6fd69c61e454d058ca4393ffd447efd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6fd69c61e454d058ca4393ffd447efd2020-11-25T02:43:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011111e016591010.1371/journal.pone.0165910Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.Nathaniel RodriguezJohan BollenYong-Yeol AhnHuman history has been marked by social instability and conflict, often driven by the irreconcilability of opposing sets of beliefs, ideologies, and religious dogmas. The dynamics of belief systems has been studied mainly from two distinct perspectives, namely how cognitive biases lead to individual belief rigidity and how social influence leads to social conformity. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects cognitive and social forces together in order to study the dynamics of societal belief evolution. Each individual is endowed with a network of interacting beliefs that evolves through interaction with other individuals in a social network. The adoption of beliefs is affected by both internal coherence and social conformity. Our framework may offer explanations for how social transitions can arise in otherwise homogeneous populations, how small numbers of zealots with highly coherent beliefs can overturn societal consensus, and how belief rigidity protects fringe groups and cults against invasion from mainstream beliefs, allowing them to persist and even thrive in larger societies. Our results suggest that strong consensus may be insufficient to guarantee social stability, that the cognitive coherence of belief-systems is vital in determining their ability to spread, and that coherent belief-systems may pose a serious problem for resolving social polarization, due to their ability to prevent consensus even under high levels of social exposure. We argue that the inclusion of cognitive factors into a social model could provide a more complete picture of collective human dynamics.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5094740?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathaniel Rodriguez
Johan Bollen
Yong-Yeol Ahn
spellingShingle Nathaniel Rodriguez
Johan Bollen
Yong-Yeol Ahn
Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nathaniel Rodriguez
Johan Bollen
Yong-Yeol Ahn
author_sort Nathaniel Rodriguez
title Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
title_short Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
title_full Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
title_fullStr Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
title_full_unstemmed Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity.
title_sort collective dynamics of belief evolution under cognitive coherence and social conformity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Human history has been marked by social instability and conflict, often driven by the irreconcilability of opposing sets of beliefs, ideologies, and religious dogmas. The dynamics of belief systems has been studied mainly from two distinct perspectives, namely how cognitive biases lead to individual belief rigidity and how social influence leads to social conformity. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects cognitive and social forces together in order to study the dynamics of societal belief evolution. Each individual is endowed with a network of interacting beliefs that evolves through interaction with other individuals in a social network. The adoption of beliefs is affected by both internal coherence and social conformity. Our framework may offer explanations for how social transitions can arise in otherwise homogeneous populations, how small numbers of zealots with highly coherent beliefs can overturn societal consensus, and how belief rigidity protects fringe groups and cults against invasion from mainstream beliefs, allowing them to persist and even thrive in larger societies. Our results suggest that strong consensus may be insufficient to guarantee social stability, that the cognitive coherence of belief-systems is vital in determining their ability to spread, and that coherent belief-systems may pose a serious problem for resolving social polarization, due to their ability to prevent consensus even under high levels of social exposure. We argue that the inclusion of cognitive factors into a social model could provide a more complete picture of collective human dynamics.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5094740?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanielrodriguez collectivedynamicsofbeliefevolutionundercognitivecoherenceandsocialconformity
AT johanbollen collectivedynamicsofbeliefevolutionundercognitivecoherenceandsocialconformity
AT yongyeolahn collectivedynamicsofbeliefevolutionundercognitivecoherenceandsocialconformity
_version_ 1724771238710083584