Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
Abstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8 |
id |
doaj-d6f7a5c9f1ae47eb9591607a6c71390a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d6f7a5c9f1ae47eb9591607a6c71390a2021-06-20T11:32:36ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-011111610.1038/s41598-021-92296-8Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessmentOlga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla0Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande1Physical Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Science Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del RosarioPhysical Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Science Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del RosarioAbstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was to determine the reproducibility and level of agreement between the Handgrip dynamometry in supine position with the elbow flexed or extended, and the one measured in the sitting position, the design was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The population were young apparently healthy between 18 and 30 years of age (N = 201). Handgrip measurement was performed on both upper limbs in a sitting position with a flexed elbow, a supine position with a flexed elbow, and supine position with the elbow extended. Reproducibility was nearly perfect in all positions (ICC 0.95–0.97). Regarding the level of agreement for the comparison between sitting and supine positions with a flexed elbow, an average difference of − 0.406. For supine position with an extended elbow and supine position with a flexed elbow, the average difference was − 1.479. Considering the results, clinicians or researchers can choose any of the positions evaluated herein and obtain reliable results as long as the standardization process is followed.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande |
spellingShingle |
Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande |
author_sort |
Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla |
title |
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
title_short |
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
title_full |
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
title_sort |
reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was to determine the reproducibility and level of agreement between the Handgrip dynamometry in supine position with the elbow flexed or extended, and the one measured in the sitting position, the design was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The population were young apparently healthy between 18 and 30 years of age (N = 201). Handgrip measurement was performed on both upper limbs in a sitting position with a flexed elbow, a supine position with a flexed elbow, and supine position with the elbow extended. Reproducibility was nearly perfect in all positions (ICC 0.95–0.97). Regarding the level of agreement for the comparison between sitting and supine positions with a flexed elbow, an average difference of − 0.406. For supine position with an extended elbow and supine position with a flexed elbow, the average difference was − 1.479. Considering the results, clinicians or researchers can choose any of the positions evaluated herein and obtain reliable results as long as the standardization process is followed. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olgaceciliavargaspinilla reproducibilityandagreementbetweenthreepositionsforhandgripassessment AT elianaisabelrodriguezgrande reproducibilityandagreementbetweenthreepositionsforhandgripassessment |
_version_ |
1721370041379717120 |