Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment

Abstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla, Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8
id doaj-d6f7a5c9f1ae47eb9591607a6c71390a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6f7a5c9f1ae47eb9591607a6c71390a2021-06-20T11:32:36ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-011111610.1038/s41598-021-92296-8Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessmentOlga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla0Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande1Physical Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Science Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del RosarioPhysical Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Science Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del RosarioAbstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was to determine the reproducibility and level of agreement between the Handgrip dynamometry in supine position with the elbow flexed or extended, and the one measured in the sitting position, the design was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The population were young apparently healthy between 18 and 30 years of age (N = 201). Handgrip measurement was performed on both upper limbs in a sitting position with a flexed elbow, a supine position with a flexed elbow, and supine position with the elbow extended. Reproducibility was nearly perfect in all positions (ICC 0.95–0.97). Regarding the level of agreement for the comparison between sitting and supine positions with a flexed elbow, an average difference of − 0.406. For supine position with an extended elbow and supine position with a flexed elbow, the average difference was − 1.479. Considering the results, clinicians or researchers can choose any of the positions evaluated herein and obtain reliable results as long as the standardization process is followed.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla
Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande
spellingShingle Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla
Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande
Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
Scientific Reports
author_facet Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla
Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande
author_sort Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla
title Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
title_short Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
title_full Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
title_fullStr Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
title_sort reproducibility and agreement between three positions for handgrip assessment
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract The protocol established for taking hand grip dynamometry measurements determines that the patient must be in a sitting position. This protocol cannot be applied due to the patient’s conditions in some cases, such as abdominal surgery, musculoskeletal spine or hip injuries. The purpose was to determine the reproducibility and level of agreement between the Handgrip dynamometry in supine position with the elbow flexed or extended, and the one measured in the sitting position, the design was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The population were young apparently healthy between 18 and 30 years of age (N = 201). Handgrip measurement was performed on both upper limbs in a sitting position with a flexed elbow, a supine position with a flexed elbow, and supine position with the elbow extended. Reproducibility was nearly perfect in all positions (ICC 0.95–0.97). Regarding the level of agreement for the comparison between sitting and supine positions with a flexed elbow, an average difference of − 0.406. For supine position with an extended elbow and supine position with a flexed elbow, the average difference was − 1.479. Considering the results, clinicians or researchers can choose any of the positions evaluated herein and obtain reliable results as long as the standardization process is followed.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92296-8
work_keys_str_mv AT olgaceciliavargaspinilla reproducibilityandagreementbetweenthreepositionsforhandgripassessment
AT elianaisabelrodriguezgrande reproducibilityandagreementbetweenthreepositionsforhandgripassessment
_version_ 1721370041379717120