Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures

Illinois had a dismal free banking experience, with over 80% of its free banks failing by the start of the Civil War. Researchers agree that a dramatic change in bond prices was the catalyst, and some have shown that the riskiest banks, ex ante, were the most likely to fail. This study examines how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott Clayman, Scott Deacle, Andrew Economopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Economic & Business History Society 2017-06-01
Series:Essays in Economic and Business History
Online Access:https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/357
id doaj-d6eccd9b73b24e52bd2ab4ec43b05753
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6eccd9b73b24e52bd2ab4ec43b057532020-11-25T02:59:19ZengEconomic & Business History SocietyEssays in Economic and Business History0896-226X2017-06-01352357Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank FailuresScott ClaymanScott Deacle0Andrew Economopoulos1Ursinus CollegeUrsinus College Illinois had a dismal free banking experience, with over 80% of its free banks failing by the start of the Civil War. Researchers agree that a dramatic change in bond prices was the catalyst, and some have shown that the riskiest banks, ex ante, were the most likely to fail. This study examines how Illinois free banks adjusted their portfolios in the face of increased political and financial risks prior to Abraham Lincoln’s election as president. Lincoln’s nomination in May 1860 and the Democratic Party schism in June 1860 raised the likelihood of secession and the potential for a significant decline in Southern bond prices. Given this heightened risk, did free bankers reduce their exposure to such a decline? In general, it appears that the free bankers took risks commensurate with expected returns and the uncertain political climate, purchased the most readily available bonds, and had sufficient backing to withstand a moderate decline in Southern bond prices. The dramatic price decline soon after the election appears to have caught many banks by surprise, like a deer caught in the headlights. https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/357
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scott Clayman
Scott Deacle
Andrew Economopoulos
spellingShingle Scott Clayman
Scott Deacle
Andrew Economopoulos
Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
Essays in Economic and Business History
author_facet Scott Clayman
Scott Deacle
Andrew Economopoulos
author_sort Scott Clayman
title Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
title_short Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
title_full Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
title_fullStr Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
title_full_unstemmed Caught in the Headlights: Revising the Road Kill Hypothesis of Antebellum Illinois Bank Failures
title_sort caught in the headlights: revising the road kill hypothesis of antebellum illinois bank failures
publisher Economic & Business History Society
series Essays in Economic and Business History
issn 0896-226X
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Illinois had a dismal free banking experience, with over 80% of its free banks failing by the start of the Civil War. Researchers agree that a dramatic change in bond prices was the catalyst, and some have shown that the riskiest banks, ex ante, were the most likely to fail. This study examines how Illinois free banks adjusted their portfolios in the face of increased political and financial risks prior to Abraham Lincoln’s election as president. Lincoln’s nomination in May 1860 and the Democratic Party schism in June 1860 raised the likelihood of secession and the potential for a significant decline in Southern bond prices. Given this heightened risk, did free bankers reduce their exposure to such a decline? In general, it appears that the free bankers took risks commensurate with expected returns and the uncertain political climate, purchased the most readily available bonds, and had sufficient backing to withstand a moderate decline in Southern bond prices. The dramatic price decline soon after the election appears to have caught many banks by surprise, like a deer caught in the headlights.
url https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/357
work_keys_str_mv AT scottclayman caughtintheheadlightsrevisingtheroadkillhypothesisofantebellumillinoisbankfailures
AT scottdeacle caughtintheheadlightsrevisingtheroadkillhypothesisofantebellumillinoisbankfailures
AT andreweconomopoulos caughtintheheadlightsrevisingtheroadkillhypothesisofantebellumillinoisbankfailures
_version_ 1724703155539673088