IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG

When we think of Ferdinand de Saussure, at the side of the known antonomasia from the sort of “father of modern linguistics”, immediately the “saussurean dichotomies” come to mind: synchrony -diachrony; language-speech; syntagma-paradigm. It is possible this recollection extends to those who have ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Hozanete Alves de Lima, Felipe Morais de Melo
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal Fluminense 2016-07-01
Series:Gragoatá
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gragoata.uff.br/index.php/gragoata/article/view/474
id doaj-d6e5fdf5c2094869b2ce3c971fbe0dad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6e5fdf5c2094869b2ce3c971fbe0dad2020-11-25T00:05:02ZporUniversidade Federal FluminenseGragoatá1413-90732358-41142016-07-012140516IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOGMaria Hozanete Alves de Lima0Felipe Morais de Melo1UFRNIFRN/UFRNWhen we think of Ferdinand de Saussure, at the side of the known antonomasia from the sort of “father of modern linguistics”, immediately the “saussurean dichotomies” come to mind: synchrony -diachrony; language-speech; syntagma-paradigm. It is possible this recollection extends to those who have never read the Course in General Linguistics (CGL). This paper reflects about the understanding of some readers of Saussure on certain specific ideas – all related to the famous dichotomies -, namely “change”, “system” and “homogeneity”; they are special readers, Coseriu (1979) and Weinreich, Labov & Herzog [WLH] (2006). We think about ideas developed in two of their works: a more  integrative relationship  between synchrony  and diachrony proposed by Coseriu (1979); the integration between system and heterogeneity set by WLH (2006). We intend to show, however, that in the CGL itself (Saussure, 1995) this integrative relationship was already set, despite the very notion of dichotomy and the methodological cuts imposed by Saussure to study the language and put linguistics within the sciences have favored a look of not integrating the notion of "system" and "homogeneity", for example. We have considered, in order to follow the traditional mark of the linguistic historiography, only the Course in General Linguistics – as a product of a canonic, divulged and orthonymous Saussure, even for the less orthonymous that, strictly speaking, can be considered the author of a work that holds in its construction the potential of apocryphal writing – letting, for a while, in “silence” the saussurean manuscripts, recently come to the public eye.http://www.gragoata.uff.br/index.php/gragoata/article/view/474Ferdinand de Saussure. Sistema e homogeneidade. Sincronia e diacronia.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Hozanete Alves de Lima
Felipe Morais de Melo
spellingShingle Maria Hozanete Alves de Lima
Felipe Morais de Melo
IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
Gragoatá
Ferdinand de Saussure. Sistema e homogeneidade. Sincronia e diacronia.
author_facet Maria Hozanete Alves de Lima
Felipe Morais de Melo
author_sort Maria Hozanete Alves de Lima
title IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
title_short IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
title_full IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
title_fullStr IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
title_full_unstemmed IN THE “LIMITS” OF FERDINAND SAUSSURE: COSERIU, WEINREICH, LABOV AND HERZOG
title_sort in the “limits” of ferdinand saussure: coseriu, weinreich, labov and herzog
publisher Universidade Federal Fluminense
series Gragoatá
issn 1413-9073
2358-4114
publishDate 2016-07-01
description When we think of Ferdinand de Saussure, at the side of the known antonomasia from the sort of “father of modern linguistics”, immediately the “saussurean dichotomies” come to mind: synchrony -diachrony; language-speech; syntagma-paradigm. It is possible this recollection extends to those who have never read the Course in General Linguistics (CGL). This paper reflects about the understanding of some readers of Saussure on certain specific ideas – all related to the famous dichotomies -, namely “change”, “system” and “homogeneity”; they are special readers, Coseriu (1979) and Weinreich, Labov & Herzog [WLH] (2006). We think about ideas developed in two of their works: a more  integrative relationship  between synchrony  and diachrony proposed by Coseriu (1979); the integration between system and heterogeneity set by WLH (2006). We intend to show, however, that in the CGL itself (Saussure, 1995) this integrative relationship was already set, despite the very notion of dichotomy and the methodological cuts imposed by Saussure to study the language and put linguistics within the sciences have favored a look of not integrating the notion of "system" and "homogeneity", for example. We have considered, in order to follow the traditional mark of the linguistic historiography, only the Course in General Linguistics – as a product of a canonic, divulged and orthonymous Saussure, even for the less orthonymous that, strictly speaking, can be considered the author of a work that holds in its construction the potential of apocryphal writing – letting, for a while, in “silence” the saussurean manuscripts, recently come to the public eye.
topic Ferdinand de Saussure. Sistema e homogeneidade. Sincronia e diacronia.
url http://www.gragoata.uff.br/index.php/gragoata/article/view/474
work_keys_str_mv AT mariahozanetealvesdelima inthelimitsofferdinandsaussurecoseriuweinreichlabovandherzog
AT felipemoraisdemelo inthelimitsofferdinandsaussurecoseriuweinreichlabovandherzog
_version_ 1725426697372696576