An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have significantly changed the audit process; nevertheless, the AI revolution opponents view this growth as a step-back as many auditors will fail to adapt to this new environment and will drop behind. Our descriptive study examines the perceived ease of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albawwat, Ibrahim, Frijat, Yaser Al
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Growing Science 2021-01-01
Series:Accounting
Online Access:http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol7/ac_2021_34.pdf
id doaj-d6e45551723944139ba7f8b6cccf1049
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6e45551723944139ba7f8b6cccf10492021-02-11T12:46:43ZengGrowing ScienceAccounting2369-73932369-74072021-01-0175576210.5267/j.ac.2021.2.009An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit qualityAlbawwat, IbrahimFrijat, Yaser Al Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have significantly changed the audit process; nevertheless, the AI revolution opponents view this growth as a step-back as many auditors will fail to adapt to this new environment and will drop behind. Our descriptive study examines the perceived ease of use, usefulness, and contribution to the audit quality of different AI’s types. To address local audit firms concerns about their readiness to use AI systems in auditing processes and to advance auditing research, we examine whether perceived ease of use, usefulness, and contribution to audit quality vary by AI systems type (Assisted, Augmented, and Autonomous). An online questionnaire was used to collect data from 124 auditors representing local audit firms in Jordan. Our results indicate that auditors perceive Assisted and Augmented AI systems as ease of use in auditing while perceiving Autonomous AI systems as complicated to use. Besides, Auditors are underestimating Autonomous AI systems’ capabilities and perceived it as not useful for auditing. The results also reveal a significant difference between the perceived contribution to audit quality by the three AI systems types. This study contributes to the existing literature on AI and auditing by developing and testing a measure for AI systems’ perceived contribution to audit quality. This study also provides empirical evidence on how Jordan local firms auditors perceive AI use in auditing.http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol7/ac_2021_34.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Albawwat, Ibrahim
Frijat, Yaser Al
spellingShingle Albawwat, Ibrahim
Frijat, Yaser Al
An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
Accounting
author_facet Albawwat, Ibrahim
Frijat, Yaser Al
author_sort Albawwat, Ibrahim
title An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
title_short An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
title_full An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
title_fullStr An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
title_sort analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality
publisher Growing Science
series Accounting
issn 2369-7393
2369-7407
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have significantly changed the audit process; nevertheless, the AI revolution opponents view this growth as a step-back as many auditors will fail to adapt to this new environment and will drop behind. Our descriptive study examines the perceived ease of use, usefulness, and contribution to the audit quality of different AI’s types. To address local audit firms concerns about their readiness to use AI systems in auditing processes and to advance auditing research, we examine whether perceived ease of use, usefulness, and contribution to audit quality vary by AI systems type (Assisted, Augmented, and Autonomous). An online questionnaire was used to collect data from 124 auditors representing local audit firms in Jordan. Our results indicate that auditors perceive Assisted and Augmented AI systems as ease of use in auditing while perceiving Autonomous AI systems as complicated to use. Besides, Auditors are underestimating Autonomous AI systems’ capabilities and perceived it as not useful for auditing. The results also reveal a significant difference between the perceived contribution to audit quality by the three AI systems types. This study contributes to the existing literature on AI and auditing by developing and testing a measure for AI systems’ perceived contribution to audit quality. This study also provides empirical evidence on how Jordan local firms auditors perceive AI use in auditing.
url http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol7/ac_2021_34.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT albawwatibrahim ananalysisofauditorsperceptionstowardsartificialintelligenceanditscontributiontoauditquality
AT frijatyaseral ananalysisofauditorsperceptionstowardsartificialintelligenceanditscontributiontoauditquality
AT albawwatibrahim analysisofauditorsperceptionstowardsartificialintelligenceanditscontributiontoauditquality
AT frijatyaseral analysisofauditorsperceptionstowardsartificialintelligenceanditscontributiontoauditquality
_version_ 1724274332462481408