Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens

Abstract In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fridus Van der Weijden, Mirella Rijnen, Cees Valkenburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3
id doaj-d6ddd2dd56ec4264a7a883ebe7bd54d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6ddd2dd56ec4264a7a883ebe7bd54d72021-03-21T12:33:51ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-011111810.1038/s41598-021-85305-3Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogensFridus Van der Weijden0Mirella Rijnen1Cees Valkenburg2Clinic for PeriodontologyClinic for PeriodontologyDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), A Joint Venture Between the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Amsterdam and Faculty of Dentistry, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAbstract In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially available qPCR kits for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were compared, using 100 clinical samples from patients with untreated periodontitis. The analysis involved two separate comparisons in which kit A (LabOral Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was compared with kit B (Advanced Dental Diagnostics, The Netherlands), and with kit C (OralDent diagnostics, The Netherlands). Analytic procedures for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were carried out according to the instructions of the laboratories. Kit A detected target species more often, and absolute numbers of bacterial cells were higher than with kit B. A high degree of similarity was found between the test outcomes by kit A and kit C. All three kits performed satisfactory but small and significant differences exist between kits.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fridus Van der Weijden
Mirella Rijnen
Cees Valkenburg
spellingShingle Fridus Van der Weijden
Mirella Rijnen
Cees Valkenburg
Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
Scientific Reports
author_facet Fridus Van der Weijden
Mirella Rijnen
Cees Valkenburg
author_sort Fridus Van der Weijden
title Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_short Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_full Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_fullStr Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_sort comparison of three qpcr-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially available qPCR kits for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were compared, using 100 clinical samples from patients with untreated periodontitis. The analysis involved two separate comparisons in which kit A (LabOral Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was compared with kit B (Advanced Dental Diagnostics, The Netherlands), and with kit C (OralDent diagnostics, The Netherlands). Analytic procedures for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were carried out according to the instructions of the laboratories. Kit A detected target species more often, and absolute numbers of bacterial cells were higher than with kit B. A high degree of similarity was found between the test outcomes by kit A and kit C. All three kits performed satisfactory but small and significant differences exist between kits.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fridusvanderweijden comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens
AT mirellarijnen comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens
AT ceesvalkenburg comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens
_version_ 1724210455788912640