Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges

Abstract Background Like most of the sub-Saharan countries, Tanzania faces significant increase in the number of patients diagnosed with an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among which only a few manage to receive chronic haemodialysis services (CHD). Yet little is known about the non-medical facilita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Godwin Pancras, Judith Shayo, Amani Anaeli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-018-1140-x
id doaj-d6d535070cdf4640b25283c187140a38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6d535070cdf4640b25283c187140a382020-11-25T01:30:03ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692018-12-0119111010.1186/s12882-018-1140-xNon-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challengesGodwin Pancras0Judith Shayo1Amani Anaeli2Department of Bioethics and Health Professionalism, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesDepartment of Development Studies, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesAbstract Background Like most of the sub-Saharan countries, Tanzania faces significant increase in the number of patients diagnosed with an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among which only a few manage to receive chronic haemodialysis services (CHD). Yet little is known about the non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing these services and the associated ethical challenges. Methods A phenomenological study design which employed a qualitative approach was used. The study was conducted at the dialysis unit harboured within Muhimbili National Hospital. Data were collected from purposively sampled health care providers and ESRD patients by using in-depth interviews. Text data obtained were analysed based on inductive and deductive content analysis methods to formulate major themes. Results Fourteen key informants were interviewed including nephrologists, renal nurses, social workers, nutritionists and ESRD patients. Three major themes were formulated: a) non-medical facilitators towards accessing CHD services which enshrines two sub-themes (membership to health insurance scheme and family support), (b) non-medical barriers towards accessing CHD services which enshrines four sub-themes (affordability of treatment costs, geographical accessibility, availability of CHD resources and acceptability of treatment procedures) and lastly (c) ethical challenges associated with accessing CHD services which also enshrines three sub-themes (dual role of health care providers, patients autonomy in decision making, and treatment disparity). Conclusion Non-medical facilitators to access CHD benefits few patients whereas non-medical barriers leave many ESRD patients untreated or partially treated. On the other hand, ethical challenges like treatment inequality are quickly gaining momentum. There is a need for guideline highlighting importance, position, and limitation of non-medical factors in the delivery of CHD services in Tanzania and other developing countries.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-018-1140-xChronic haemodialysisAccessEnd-stage renal diseaseEthical challengesBarriersTanzania
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Godwin Pancras
Judith Shayo
Amani Anaeli
spellingShingle Godwin Pancras
Judith Shayo
Amani Anaeli
Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
BMC Nephrology
Chronic haemodialysis
Access
End-stage renal disease
Ethical challenges
Barriers
Tanzania
author_facet Godwin Pancras
Judith Shayo
Amani Anaeli
author_sort Godwin Pancras
title Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
title_short Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
title_full Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
title_fullStr Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
title_full_unstemmed Non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
title_sort non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing haemodialysis services: an exploration of ethical challenges
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background Like most of the sub-Saharan countries, Tanzania faces significant increase in the number of patients diagnosed with an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among which only a few manage to receive chronic haemodialysis services (CHD). Yet little is known about the non-medical facilitators and barriers towards accessing these services and the associated ethical challenges. Methods A phenomenological study design which employed a qualitative approach was used. The study was conducted at the dialysis unit harboured within Muhimbili National Hospital. Data were collected from purposively sampled health care providers and ESRD patients by using in-depth interviews. Text data obtained were analysed based on inductive and deductive content analysis methods to formulate major themes. Results Fourteen key informants were interviewed including nephrologists, renal nurses, social workers, nutritionists and ESRD patients. Three major themes were formulated: a) non-medical facilitators towards accessing CHD services which enshrines two sub-themes (membership to health insurance scheme and family support), (b) non-medical barriers towards accessing CHD services which enshrines four sub-themes (affordability of treatment costs, geographical accessibility, availability of CHD resources and acceptability of treatment procedures) and lastly (c) ethical challenges associated with accessing CHD services which also enshrines three sub-themes (dual role of health care providers, patients autonomy in decision making, and treatment disparity). Conclusion Non-medical facilitators to access CHD benefits few patients whereas non-medical barriers leave many ESRD patients untreated or partially treated. On the other hand, ethical challenges like treatment inequality are quickly gaining momentum. There is a need for guideline highlighting importance, position, and limitation of non-medical factors in the delivery of CHD services in Tanzania and other developing countries.
topic Chronic haemodialysis
Access
End-stage renal disease
Ethical challenges
Barriers
Tanzania
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-018-1140-x
work_keys_str_mv AT godwinpancras nonmedicalfacilitatorsandbarrierstowardsaccessinghaemodialysisservicesanexplorationofethicalchallenges
AT judithshayo nonmedicalfacilitatorsandbarrierstowardsaccessinghaemodialysisservicesanexplorationofethicalchallenges
AT amanianaeli nonmedicalfacilitatorsandbarrierstowardsaccessinghaemodialysisservicesanexplorationofethicalchallenges
_version_ 1725093996215140352