La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double

This study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Keime
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Société d’Études Platoniciennes 2014-12-01
Series:Études Platoniciennes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535
id doaj-d6c8b17126c949f4a3913710f2be7b9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6c8b17126c949f4a3913710f2be7b9b2020-11-25T01:09:00ZdeuSociété d’Études PlatoniciennesÉtudes Platoniciennes2275-17852014-12-011110.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.535La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son doubleChristian KeimeThis study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of the framing dialogue (Agathon and Socrates as an accomplished philosopher): Diotima is the dialectician Socrates considered from the point of view of a poet and a follower of the sophists, whilst the young Socrates is Agathon dressed up as a dialectician. Drawing on this description, I argue that the mask of Diotima, and more generally the whole dialogue narrated by Socrates, are literary devices designed to provide, besides a theory of love, a lesson in communication that prompts the reader to interpret correctly the lesson on eros: (1) Plato shows that the dialectician must adapt his lesson to his addressees, (2) he brings out the limits of a lesson on eros delivered in the form of a didactic monologue, and (3) he vindicates the necessity of teaching through reported dialogue, whether orally or in writing.http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535SymposiumDiotimaerosdialoguecommunication
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Keime
spellingShingle Christian Keime
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
Études Platoniciennes
Symposium
Diotima
eros
dialogue
communication
author_facet Christian Keime
author_sort Christian Keime
title La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
title_short La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
title_full La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
title_fullStr La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
title_full_unstemmed La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
title_sort la fonction de diotime dans le banquet de platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
publisher Société d’Études Platoniciennes
series Études Platoniciennes
issn 2275-1785
publishDate 2014-12-01
description This study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of the framing dialogue (Agathon and Socrates as an accomplished philosopher): Diotima is the dialectician Socrates considered from the point of view of a poet and a follower of the sophists, whilst the young Socrates is Agathon dressed up as a dialectician. Drawing on this description, I argue that the mask of Diotima, and more generally the whole dialogue narrated by Socrates, are literary devices designed to provide, besides a theory of love, a lesson in communication that prompts the reader to interpret correctly the lesson on eros: (1) Plato shows that the dialectician must adapt his lesson to his addressees, (2) he brings out the limits of a lesson on eros delivered in the form of a didactic monologue, and (3) he vindicates the necessity of teaching through reported dialogue, whether orally or in writing.
topic Symposium
Diotima
eros
dialogue
communication
url http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535
work_keys_str_mv AT christiankeime lafonctiondediotimedanslebanquetdeplaton201d1212c3ledialogueetsondouble
_version_ 1725180484001988608