La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double
This study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Société d’Études Platoniciennes
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Études Platoniciennes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535 |
id |
doaj-d6c8b17126c949f4a3913710f2be7b9b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d6c8b17126c949f4a3913710f2be7b9b2020-11-25T01:09:00ZdeuSociété d’Études PlatoniciennesÉtudes Platoniciennes2275-17852014-12-011110.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.535La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son doubleChristian KeimeThis study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of the framing dialogue (Agathon and Socrates as an accomplished philosopher): Diotima is the dialectician Socrates considered from the point of view of a poet and a follower of the sophists, whilst the young Socrates is Agathon dressed up as a dialectician. Drawing on this description, I argue that the mask of Diotima, and more generally the whole dialogue narrated by Socrates, are literary devices designed to provide, besides a theory of love, a lesson in communication that prompts the reader to interpret correctly the lesson on eros: (1) Plato shows that the dialectician must adapt his lesson to his addressees, (2) he brings out the limits of a lesson on eros delivered in the form of a didactic monologue, and (3) he vindicates the necessity of teaching through reported dialogue, whether orally or in writing.http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535SymposiumDiotimaerosdialoguecommunication |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christian Keime |
spellingShingle |
Christian Keime La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double Études Platoniciennes Symposium Diotima eros dialogue communication |
author_facet |
Christian Keime |
author_sort |
Christian Keime |
title |
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
title_short |
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
title_full |
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
title_fullStr |
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
title_full_unstemmed |
La fonction de Diotime dans le Banquet de Platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
title_sort |
la fonction de diotime dans le banquet de platon (201d1-212c3) : le dialogue et son double |
publisher |
Société d’Études Platoniciennes |
series |
Études Platoniciennes |
issn |
2275-1785 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
This study investigates the reason why, in Plato’s Symposium, Socrates delivers his lesson on Eros by reporting a dialogue between two characters, Diotima, and Socrates when he was younger. I show first that each character of this embedded dialogue can be considered as a mix of the two characters of the framing dialogue (Agathon and Socrates as an accomplished philosopher): Diotima is the dialectician Socrates considered from the point of view of a poet and a follower of the sophists, whilst the young Socrates is Agathon dressed up as a dialectician. Drawing on this description, I argue that the mask of Diotima, and more generally the whole dialogue narrated by Socrates, are literary devices designed to provide, besides a theory of love, a lesson in communication that prompts the reader to interpret correctly the lesson on eros: (1) Plato shows that the dialectician must adapt his lesson to his addressees, (2) he brings out the limits of a lesson on eros delivered in the form of a didactic monologue, and (3) he vindicates the necessity of teaching through reported dialogue, whether orally or in writing. |
topic |
Symposium Diotima eros dialogue communication |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/535 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christiankeime lafonctiondediotimedanslebanquetdeplaton201d1212c3ledialogueetsondouble |
_version_ |
1725180484001988608 |