Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement
Cost-effectiveness evaluations concerning devices for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have little impact on real-life management of these devices. This study explored how pharmacoeconomic models can inform the procurement of TKA devices to improve their value for money. Our study included three phases...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Medical Publishing
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Orthopedic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7488 |
id |
doaj-d6be96c1844d4ca68eb2a93fd060f503 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d6be96c1844d4ca68eb2a93fd060f5032021-05-02T21:16:24ZengOpen Medical PublishingOrthopedic Reviews2035-82372035-81642018-02-019410.4081/or.2017.74883881Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacementAndrea Messori0Sabrina Trippoli1HTA Section, ESTAR Toscana, Regional Health Service, FirenzeHTA Section, ESTAR Toscana, Regional Health Service, FirenzeCost-effectiveness evaluations concerning devices for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have little impact on real-life management of these devices. This study explored how pharmacoeconomic models can inform the procurement of TKA devices to improve their value for money. Our study included three phases: i) literature search for data of outcome, cost, and device type in TKA; ii) development of a Markov model predicting costs, QALYs, and net monetary benefit (NMB); iii) simulation of tenders aimed at value-based device procurement. Phases 1 and 2 were managed by selecting a single study as the source of data for our analysis. In Phase 3, each TKA device was associated with its values of NMB, and the tender scores were estimated. Finally, the ranking of each device in the simulated tender was determined. We identified a study published in 2016 as our source of data. Five devices were evaluated. For these devices, QALYs were 7.3952, 7.2939, 7.4952, 7.1919, 7.2930; NMB: £142,005, £140,653, £144,184, £138,040, £140,261; tender scores: 64.53, 42.53, 100, 0, 36.15, respectively. We showed that incorporating the principles of cost-effectiveness into the tendering process is feasible for TKA devices. This can maximize the value for money for these devices.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7488knee arthroplastycost-effectivenessMarkov modelingnet monetary benefittendersprocurement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Messori Sabrina Trippoli |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Messori Sabrina Trippoli Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement Orthopedic Reviews knee arthroplasty cost-effectiveness Markov modeling net monetary benefit tenders procurement |
author_facet |
Andrea Messori Sabrina Trippoli |
author_sort |
Andrea Messori |
title |
Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
title_short |
Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
title_full |
Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
title_fullStr |
Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
title_sort |
value-based procurement of prostheses for total knee replacement |
publisher |
Open Medical Publishing |
series |
Orthopedic Reviews |
issn |
2035-8237 2035-8164 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Cost-effectiveness evaluations concerning devices for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have little impact on real-life management of these devices. This study explored how pharmacoeconomic models can inform the procurement of TKA devices to improve their value for money. Our study included three phases: i) literature search for data of outcome, cost, and device type in TKA; ii) development of a Markov model predicting costs, QALYs, and net monetary benefit (NMB); iii) simulation of tenders aimed at value-based device procurement. Phases 1 and 2 were managed by selecting a single study as the source of data for our analysis. In Phase 3, each TKA device was associated with its values of NMB, and the tender scores were estimated. Finally, the ranking of each device in the simulated tender was determined. We identified a study published in 2016 as our source of data. Five devices were evaluated. For these devices, QALYs were 7.3952, 7.2939, 7.4952, 7.1919, 7.2930; NMB: £142,005, £140,653, £144,184, £138,040, £140,261; tender scores: 64.53, 42.53, 100, 0, 36.15, respectively. We showed that incorporating the principles of cost-effectiveness into the tendering process is feasible for TKA devices. This can maximize the value for money for these devices. |
topic |
knee arthroplasty cost-effectiveness Markov modeling net monetary benefit tenders procurement |
url |
http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7488 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreamessori valuebasedprocurementofprosthesesfortotalkneereplacement AT sabrinatrippoli valuebasedprocurementofprosthesesfortotalkneereplacement |
_version_ |
1721487368145338368 |