Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability

<p>Misrepresentations of wind shear and stratification around the tropopause in numerical weather prediction models can lead to errors in potential vorticity gradients with repercussions for Rossby wave propagation and baroclinic instability. Using a diabatic extension of the linear quasi-geos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. F. Haualand, T. Spengler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-08-01
Series:Weather and Climate Dynamics
Online Access:https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/2/695/2021/wcd-2-695-2021.pdf
id doaj-d6a2a5e4dcce4ab3ab8a7a669ff53704
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6a2a5e4dcce4ab3ab8a7a669ff537042021-08-03T11:51:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsWeather and Climate Dynamics2698-40162021-08-01269571210.5194/wcd-2-695-2021Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instabilityK. F. HaualandT. Spengler<p>Misrepresentations of wind shear and stratification around the tropopause in numerical weather prediction models can lead to errors in potential vorticity gradients with repercussions for Rossby wave propagation and baroclinic instability. Using a diabatic extension of the linear quasi-geostrophic Eady model featuring a tropopause, we investigate the influence of such discrepancies on baroclinic instability by varying tropopause sharpness and altitude as well as wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, which can be associated with model or data assimilation errors or a downward extension of a weakened polar vortex. We find that baroclinic development is less sensitive to tropopause sharpness than to modifications in wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, where the latter are associated with a net change in the vertical integral of the horizontal potential vorticity gradient across the tropopause. To further quantify the relevance of these sensitivities, we compare these findings to the impact of including mid-tropospheric latent heating. For representative modifications of wind shear, stratification, and latent heating intensity, the sensitivity of baroclinic instability to tropopause structure is significantly less than that to latent heating of different intensities. These findings indicate that tropopause sharpness might be less important for baroclinic development than previously anticipated and that latent heating and the structure in the lower stratosphere could play a more crucial role, with latent heating being the dominant factor.</p>https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/2/695/2021/wcd-2-695-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. F. Haualand
T. Spengler
spellingShingle K. F. Haualand
T. Spengler
Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
Weather and Climate Dynamics
author_facet K. F. Haualand
T. Spengler
author_sort K. F. Haualand
title Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
title_short Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
title_full Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
title_fullStr Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
title_full_unstemmed Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
title_sort relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Weather and Climate Dynamics
issn 2698-4016
publishDate 2021-08-01
description <p>Misrepresentations of wind shear and stratification around the tropopause in numerical weather prediction models can lead to errors in potential vorticity gradients with repercussions for Rossby wave propagation and baroclinic instability. Using a diabatic extension of the linear quasi-geostrophic Eady model featuring a tropopause, we investigate the influence of such discrepancies on baroclinic instability by varying tropopause sharpness and altitude as well as wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, which can be associated with model or data assimilation errors or a downward extension of a weakened polar vortex. We find that baroclinic development is less sensitive to tropopause sharpness than to modifications in wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, where the latter are associated with a net change in the vertical integral of the horizontal potential vorticity gradient across the tropopause. To further quantify the relevance of these sensitivities, we compare these findings to the impact of including mid-tropospheric latent heating. For representative modifications of wind shear, stratification, and latent heating intensity, the sensitivity of baroclinic instability to tropopause structure is significantly less than that to latent heating of different intensities. These findings indicate that tropopause sharpness might be less important for baroclinic development than previously anticipated and that latent heating and the structure in the lower stratosphere could play a more crucial role, with latent heating being the dominant factor.</p>
url https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/2/695/2021/wcd-2-695-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kfhaualand relativeimportanceoftropopausestructureanddiabaticheatingforbaroclinicinstability
AT tspengler relativeimportanceoftropopausestructureanddiabaticheatingforbaroclinicinstability
_version_ 1721223277645398016