Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie

The article questions real theological character of some streams of the older Czech moral theological thought which ended in 1948 (beginning of the communist regime) and after 1989 has never been quoted or mentioned. It was a rationalistic neo-scholastic period of abstract philosophical theology The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Libor Ovečka
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2020-06-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363398.2015.61
id doaj-d68f71a342b542ffbbe345902024326e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d68f71a342b542ffbbe345902024326e2020-11-25T03:05:54ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae Theologica1804-55882336-33982020-06-0111678610.14712/23363398.2015.611292Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologieLibor OvečkaThe article questions real theological character of some streams of the older Czech moral theological thought which ended in 1948 (beginning of the communist regime) and after 1989 has never been quoted or mentioned. It was a rationalistic neo-scholastic period of abstract philosophical theology The blind alleys of theology can be traced in such areas as: the Scripture and philosophical speculation; “good” deed being good only as resulting in one’s eternal happiness; personal spiritual life and universally binding moral norms; moral norms and the church and state law; natural ethics; dependence of theology on the political situation; universal validity and particular character of catholic moral theology; moral and religious norms of acting; moral responsibility to one’s conscience and ethical responsibility to a heteronomous authority. As examples of a really theological moral theology the work of Thomas Aquinas and Franz Bockle are presented. Their rationally constructed theology may be opposed by legal or disciplinary measures, religious manipulation, direct arguing by the will of God, or blind obedience. Nevertheless, personal moral responsibility remains undisputed. It is necessary to free oneself from some thought patterns and false traditions to uphold responsibility to the tradition of faith and real theology.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363398.2015.61theological ethicsmoral theologyczech history before 1948neo-scholasticismblind alleys of theologyconsciencepersonal moral responsibility
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Libor Ovečka
spellingShingle Libor Ovečka
Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica
theological ethics
moral theology
czech history before 1948
neo-scholasticism
blind alleys of theology
conscience
personal moral responsibility
author_facet Libor Ovečka
author_sort Libor Ovečka
title Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
title_short Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
title_full Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
title_fullStr Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
title_full_unstemmed Kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
title_sort kdy není teologická etika teologická: problémy v české tradici morální teologie
publisher Karolinum Press
series Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica
issn 1804-5588
2336-3398
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The article questions real theological character of some streams of the older Czech moral theological thought which ended in 1948 (beginning of the communist regime) and after 1989 has never been quoted or mentioned. It was a rationalistic neo-scholastic period of abstract philosophical theology The blind alleys of theology can be traced in such areas as: the Scripture and philosophical speculation; “good” deed being good only as resulting in one’s eternal happiness; personal spiritual life and universally binding moral norms; moral norms and the church and state law; natural ethics; dependence of theology on the political situation; universal validity and particular character of catholic moral theology; moral and religious norms of acting; moral responsibility to one’s conscience and ethical responsibility to a heteronomous authority. As examples of a really theological moral theology the work of Thomas Aquinas and Franz Bockle are presented. Their rationally constructed theology may be opposed by legal or disciplinary measures, religious manipulation, direct arguing by the will of God, or blind obedience. Nevertheless, personal moral responsibility remains undisputed. It is necessary to free oneself from some thought patterns and false traditions to uphold responsibility to the tradition of faith and real theology.
topic theological ethics
moral theology
czech history before 1948
neo-scholasticism
blind alleys of theology
conscience
personal moral responsibility
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363398.2015.61
work_keys_str_mv AT liborovecka kdyneniteologickaetikateologickaproblemyvcesketradicimoralniteologie
_version_ 1724676590290337792