Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes

Vaccine hesitancy is not a singular view but encompasses a set of positions located between complete acceptance of vaccination and complete rejection of vaccination. In this paper, I argue that vaccine-hesitant attitudes emerge at the intersection of individual and structural processes, and thus can...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vulpe Simona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-06-01
Series:European Review Of Applied Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/eras-2020-0005
id doaj-d68c68092f5047ac9719b0b1564b99c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d68c68092f5047ac9719b0b1564b99c22021-09-05T20:44:55ZengSciendoEuropean Review Of Applied Sociology2286-25522020-06-011320435710.1515/eras-2020-0005eras-2020-0005Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended AttitudesVulpe Simona0Interdisciplinary School of Doctoral Studies, University of Bucharest, RomaniaVaccine hesitancy is not a singular view but encompasses a set of positions located between complete acceptance of vaccination and complete rejection of vaccination. In this paper, I argue that vaccine-hesitant attitudes emerge at the intersection of individual and structural processes, and thus can be better conceptualized as “extended attitudes”. Drawing on the theoretical understanding of risk and science scepticism in post-modern societies, I consider hesitant attitudes towards vaccination as addressing risks that are induced in our everyday lives by science developments. I conducted K-Means Cluster Analysis on Eurobarometer data from 2019 regarding Europeans’ attitudes towards vaccination. Four clusters of vaccine-hesitant attitudes were identified. “Price hesitation” and “Effort hesitation” result from restricted access to vaccination because of structural constraints, such as low economic capital and health care system’ deficits. “Unexercised pro-vaccination” is an attitude manifested by people who grant authority to science to manage health-related risks, even though they did not vaccinate in the last five years. “Consistent anti-vaccination” pertains to highly reflexive individuals who dismiss experts’ authority because of scientifically derived risks. My analysis enhances the theoretical understanding and the empirical assessment of vaccine-hesitant attitudes in the European Union and can inform public health policies in this area.https://doi.org/10.1515/eras-2020-0005vaccine hesitancycluster analysiseuropean unionextended attituderiskshealth care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vulpe Simona
spellingShingle Vulpe Simona
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
European Review Of Applied Sociology
vaccine hesitancy
cluster analysis
european union
extended attitude
risks
health care
author_facet Vulpe Simona
author_sort Vulpe Simona
title Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
title_short Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
title_full Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
title_fullStr Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as Extended Attitudes
title_sort understanding vaccine hesitancy as extended attitudes
publisher Sciendo
series European Review Of Applied Sociology
issn 2286-2552
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Vaccine hesitancy is not a singular view but encompasses a set of positions located between complete acceptance of vaccination and complete rejection of vaccination. In this paper, I argue that vaccine-hesitant attitudes emerge at the intersection of individual and structural processes, and thus can be better conceptualized as “extended attitudes”. Drawing on the theoretical understanding of risk and science scepticism in post-modern societies, I consider hesitant attitudes towards vaccination as addressing risks that are induced in our everyday lives by science developments. I conducted K-Means Cluster Analysis on Eurobarometer data from 2019 regarding Europeans’ attitudes towards vaccination. Four clusters of vaccine-hesitant attitudes were identified. “Price hesitation” and “Effort hesitation” result from restricted access to vaccination because of structural constraints, such as low economic capital and health care system’ deficits. “Unexercised pro-vaccination” is an attitude manifested by people who grant authority to science to manage health-related risks, even though they did not vaccinate in the last five years. “Consistent anti-vaccination” pertains to highly reflexive individuals who dismiss experts’ authority because of scientifically derived risks. My analysis enhances the theoretical understanding and the empirical assessment of vaccine-hesitant attitudes in the European Union and can inform public health policies in this area.
topic vaccine hesitancy
cluster analysis
european union
extended attitude
risks
health care
url https://doi.org/10.1515/eras-2020-0005
work_keys_str_mv AT vulpesimona understandingvaccinehesitancyasextendedattitudes
_version_ 1717784875293999104