Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature

Abstract A double-twist torsion testing technique has been developed using a 316 stainless steel as an exemplar material to experimentally assess recrystallization behavior and determine the non-recrystallization temperature (Tnr). This new method was compared to the traditional methods of double-hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trevor J. Ballard, John G. Speer, Kip O. Findley, Emmanuel De Moor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81139-1
id doaj-d662925e057c4d3f8e1bc2f3d271512f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d662925e057c4d3f8e1bc2f3d271512f2021-01-17T12:42:21ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-01-0111111910.1038/s41598-021-81139-1Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperatureTrevor J. Ballard0John G. Speer1Kip O. Findley2Emmanuel De Moor3Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, Colorado School of MinesAdvanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, Colorado School of MinesAdvanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, Colorado School of MinesAdvanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, Colorado School of MinesAbstract A double-twist torsion testing technique has been developed using a 316 stainless steel as an exemplar material to experimentally assess recrystallization behavior and determine the non-recrystallization temperature (Tnr). This new method was compared to the traditional methods of double-hit compression and multi-step hot torsion testing. The double-twist torsion test allows Tnr to be related to the extent of austenite recrystallization through measurements of fractional softening while accommodating multiple deformation and recrystallization steps with a single specimen. The double-twist torsion test resulted in average Tnr values similar to those determined with multi-step hot torsion, and a partially recrystallized microstructure was observed in the vicinity of the calculated Tnr for all three methods. The ability of the double-twist torsion test to relate the experimental Tnr to the evolution of austenite recrystallization via fractional softening measurements while incorporating effects of multiple deformation steps offers an advantage over traditional methods for quantifying changes in austenite recrystallization during thermomechanical processing.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81139-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trevor J. Ballard
John G. Speer
Kip O. Findley
Emmanuel De Moor
spellingShingle Trevor J. Ballard
John G. Speer
Kip O. Findley
Emmanuel De Moor
Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
Scientific Reports
author_facet Trevor J. Ballard
John G. Speer
Kip O. Findley
Emmanuel De Moor
author_sort Trevor J. Ballard
title Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
title_short Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
title_full Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
title_fullStr Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
title_full_unstemmed Double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
title_sort double twist torsion testing to determine the non recrystallization temperature
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract A double-twist torsion testing technique has been developed using a 316 stainless steel as an exemplar material to experimentally assess recrystallization behavior and determine the non-recrystallization temperature (Tnr). This new method was compared to the traditional methods of double-hit compression and multi-step hot torsion testing. The double-twist torsion test allows Tnr to be related to the extent of austenite recrystallization through measurements of fractional softening while accommodating multiple deformation and recrystallization steps with a single specimen. The double-twist torsion test resulted in average Tnr values similar to those determined with multi-step hot torsion, and a partially recrystallized microstructure was observed in the vicinity of the calculated Tnr for all three methods. The ability of the double-twist torsion test to relate the experimental Tnr to the evolution of austenite recrystallization via fractional softening measurements while incorporating effects of multiple deformation steps offers an advantage over traditional methods for quantifying changes in austenite recrystallization during thermomechanical processing.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81139-1
work_keys_str_mv AT trevorjballard doubletwisttorsiontestingtodeterminethenonrecrystallizationtemperature
AT johngspeer doubletwisttorsiontestingtodeterminethenonrecrystallizationtemperature
AT kipofindley doubletwisttorsiontestingtodeterminethenonrecrystallizationtemperature
AT emmanueldemoor doubletwisttorsiontestingtodeterminethenonrecrystallizationtemperature
_version_ 1714941751011049472