Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow

This paper explores the inter-related themes of invisibility and obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow, as they reveal a gradated movement from the struggle between the “animate” and the “inanimate,” to the resistance against the inanimateness of the system th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Jahshan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Française d'Etudes Américaines 2010-10-01
Series:Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/4860
id doaj-d65889f0ccd04b33bc95f663d0366512
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d65889f0ccd04b33bc95f663d03665122021-10-05T12:43:36ZengAssociation Française d'Etudes AméricainesTransatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines1765-27662010-10-01110.4000/transatlantica.4860Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s RainbowPaul JahshanThis paper explores the inter-related themes of invisibility and obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow, as they reveal a gradated movement from the struggle between the “animate” and the “inanimate,” to the resistance against the inanimateness of the system through strategies of invisibility, to, finally, the ultimate, obscene challenge posed by the inanimate to humanity as it takes the shape of what is known as the “new technologies.” The margins between the two is a space of slippage and also, paradoxically, the locus of a discourse of technological power for both “Preterite” and “Elect,” and Pynchon’s treatment of these issues in the 1960s and 1970s is relevant at the beginning of the twenty-first century when the Cartesian model is complicated by a digital culture poised to replace reality with the simulacra of cyberspace; this prospect is initially met by a resistance of invisibility inhabiting the dark margins, not only of textual discourse, but also of society as it takes shape in the practices of everyday life. The invisibility of the Preterite is not only a reaction to the obscenity of the Elect but is also, as it reaches an interpretative extreme, another form of technological obscenity not less powerful than that of the Elect. Pynchon’s three texts show that Preterite and Elect are never clear-cut positions but rather exhibit, in dialectical fashion, a slippage from one to the other.http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/4860Thomas PynchonPreteriteElectobscenityinvisibilityNew Technologies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Jahshan
spellingShingle Paul Jahshan
Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
Thomas Pynchon
Preterite
Elect
obscenity
invisibility
New Technologies
author_facet Paul Jahshan
author_sort Paul Jahshan
title Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
title_short Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
title_full Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
title_fullStr Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
title_full_unstemmed Dark Margins: Invisibility and Obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow
title_sort dark margins: invisibility and obscenity in thomas pynchon’s v., the crying of lot 49, and gravity’s rainbow
publisher Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
series Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
issn 1765-2766
publishDate 2010-10-01
description This paper explores the inter-related themes of invisibility and obscenity in Thomas Pynchon’s V., The Crying of Lot 49, and Gravity’s Rainbow, as they reveal a gradated movement from the struggle between the “animate” and the “inanimate,” to the resistance against the inanimateness of the system through strategies of invisibility, to, finally, the ultimate, obscene challenge posed by the inanimate to humanity as it takes the shape of what is known as the “new technologies.” The margins between the two is a space of slippage and also, paradoxically, the locus of a discourse of technological power for both “Preterite” and “Elect,” and Pynchon’s treatment of these issues in the 1960s and 1970s is relevant at the beginning of the twenty-first century when the Cartesian model is complicated by a digital culture poised to replace reality with the simulacra of cyberspace; this prospect is initially met by a resistance of invisibility inhabiting the dark margins, not only of textual discourse, but also of society as it takes shape in the practices of everyday life. The invisibility of the Preterite is not only a reaction to the obscenity of the Elect but is also, as it reaches an interpretative extreme, another form of technological obscenity not less powerful than that of the Elect. Pynchon’s three texts show that Preterite and Elect are never clear-cut positions but rather exhibit, in dialectical fashion, a slippage from one to the other.
topic Thomas Pynchon
Preterite
Elect
obscenity
invisibility
New Technologies
url http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/4860
work_keys_str_mv AT pauljahshan darkmarginsinvisibilityandobscenityinthomaspynchonsvthecryingoflot49andgravitysrainbow
_version_ 1716842783216500736