LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?

Using the cointegration model and Granger causality, this paper explains how trade flows affected the US economy via consumption expenditures in the 1960-93 subperiod. However, trade flows did not significantly affect the US economy in the 1994-98 subperiod because consumption expenditures weakly ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kofi Amoateng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: People & Global Business Association (P&GBA) 2000-09-01
Series:Global Business and Finance Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625113710-VX6B1.pdf
id doaj-d6321e894dba4816ad6d91f2bbf405d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6321e894dba4816ad6d91f2bbf405d82021-02-17T08:08:26ZengPeople & Global Business Association (P&GBA)Global Business and Finance Review 1088-69312384-16482000-09-01523050LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?Kofi Amoateng0North Carolina Central UniversityUsing the cointegration model and Granger causality, this paper explains how trade flows affected the US economy via consumption expenditures in the 1960-93 subperiod. However, trade flows did not significantly affect the US economy in the 1994-98 subperiod because consumption expenditures weakly caused US gross domestic product. Therefore, currency crises in Latin America and East Asia did not produce any negative effects on the US economy in the late 1990s. Thus, high productivity in the technology sector, low petroleum prices due in part to low demand in Asia, massive influx o fforeign capital largely from Asia to the United States, and cheap imported goods from Asia helped the US economy shrug off these currency crises in the late 1990s.http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625113710-VX6B1.pdftrade flowcurrencyconsumption expenditurescurrency crisis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kofi Amoateng
spellingShingle Kofi Amoateng
LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
Global Business and Finance Review
trade flow
currency
consumption expenditures
currency crisis
author_facet Kofi Amoateng
author_sort Kofi Amoateng
title LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
title_short LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
title_full LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
title_fullStr LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
title_full_unstemmed LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GLOBAL TRADE FLOWS: WHERE DOES THE U.S. ECONOMY STAND?
title_sort level of exposure to global trade flows: where does the u.s. economy stand?
publisher People & Global Business Association (P&GBA)
series Global Business and Finance Review
issn 1088-6931
2384-1648
publishDate 2000-09-01
description Using the cointegration model and Granger causality, this paper explains how trade flows affected the US economy via consumption expenditures in the 1960-93 subperiod. However, trade flows did not significantly affect the US economy in the 1994-98 subperiod because consumption expenditures weakly caused US gross domestic product. Therefore, currency crises in Latin America and East Asia did not produce any negative effects on the US economy in the late 1990s. Thus, high productivity in the technology sector, low petroleum prices due in part to low demand in Asia, massive influx o fforeign capital largely from Asia to the United States, and cheap imported goods from Asia helped the US economy shrug off these currency crises in the late 1990s.
topic trade flow
currency
consumption expenditures
currency crisis
url http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625113710-VX6B1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kofiamoateng levelofexposuretoglobaltradeflowswheredoestheuseconomystand
_version_ 1724265387876417536