Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test

<b>Purpose:</b> Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lababidi H, Hijaoui A, Zarzour M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2008;volume=3;issue=2;spage=44;epage=47;aulast=Lababidi
id doaj-d62e53a3e9b84ef2abac3dcbae19e4dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d62e53a3e9b84ef2abac3dcbae19e4dc2020-11-24T23:02:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Thoracic Medicine1817-17371998-35572008-01-01324447Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control testLababidi HHijaoui AZarzour M<b>Purpose:</b> Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. <b> Results: </b> 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 &#x002B; 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 &#x002B; 1.0 L (89.2&#x0025; &#x002B; 23.6&#x0025; of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 &#x002B; 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 &#x002B; 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (<i> r</i> = 0.482, <i> P</i> = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (<i> r</i> = -0.350, <i> P</i> = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (<i> r</i> = 0.185, <i> P</i> = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (<i> F</i> = 3.37, <i> P</i> = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (<i> F</i> = 3.62, <i> P</i> = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. <b> Conclusion:</b> The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1.http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2008;volume=3;issue=2;spage=44;epage=47;aulast=LababidiAsthmaasthma assessmentasthma control test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lababidi H
Hijaoui A
Zarzour M
spellingShingle Lababidi H
Hijaoui A
Zarzour M
Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Asthma
asthma assessment
asthma control test
author_facet Lababidi H
Hijaoui A
Zarzour M
author_sort Lababidi H
title Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_short Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_full Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_fullStr Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_sort validation of the arabic version of the asthma control test
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Annals of Thoracic Medicine
issn 1817-1737
1998-3557
publishDate 2008-01-01
description <b>Purpose:</b> Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. <b> Results: </b> 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 &#x002B; 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 &#x002B; 1.0 L (89.2&#x0025; &#x002B; 23.6&#x0025; of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 &#x002B; 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 &#x002B; 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (<i> r</i> = 0.482, <i> P</i> = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (<i> r</i> = -0.350, <i> P</i> = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (<i> r</i> = 0.185, <i> P</i> = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (<i> F</i> = 3.37, <i> P</i> = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (<i> F</i> = 3.62, <i> P</i> = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. <b> Conclusion:</b> The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1.
topic Asthma
asthma assessment
asthma control test
url http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2008;volume=3;issue=2;spage=44;epage=47;aulast=Lababidi
work_keys_str_mv AT lababidih validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest
AT hijaouia validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest
AT zarzourm validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest
_version_ 1725635774653661184