Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy

AIM: To compare the efficacy of fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%(FCBT)with apraclonidine 0.5%(APRA)in preventing intraocular pressure(IOP)elevations after neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet(Nd:YAG)laser posterior capsulotomy.<p>METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erkan &#xC7;elik, Gonul Altun, Gursoy Alagoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2016-01-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2016/1/201601004.pdf
id doaj-d62d7aa39b0446418042b35134a24a93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d62d7aa39b0446418042b35134a24a932020-11-24T22:56:53ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232016-01-01161141810.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.1.04Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomyErkan &#xC7;elik0Gonul Altun1Gursoy Alagoz2Department of Ophthalmology,Sakarya University Medical Education and Research Hospital, Sakarya 54000, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology,Sakarya University Medical Education and Research Hospital, Sakarya 54000, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology,Sakarya University Medical Education and Research Hospital, Sakarya 54000, TurkeyAIM: To compare the efficacy of fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%(FCBT)with apraclonidine 0.5%(APRA)in preventing intraocular pressure(IOP)elevations after neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet(Nd:YAG)laser posterior capsulotomy.<p>METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical study included 90 eyes of 90 consecutive patients who had Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification(PCO). Patients were randomized to receive APRA(<i>n</i>=45)or FCBT(<i>n</i>=45)at 1h before laser surgery. A masked observer measured IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry before the procedure and at 1, 2, 3, 24h and 7d after laser treatment. IOP outcome measures were grouped into the following categories: post laser IOP elevation of 5 to <10 mm Hg, and post laser IOP elevation of 10 mm Hg or more. IOP elevation of <5 mm Hg was not considered a clinically significant change.<p>RESULTS:The mean IOP before surgery on the day of the procedure was 14.1±2.1 mm Hg in the APRA group and 13.2±2.1 mm Hg in the FCBT group. There was no statistically significant difference between the APRA and the FCBT groups of baseline IOPs measured(<i>P</i>=0.066). During the follow-up time, the mean IOP was lower in FCBT group, but this was not statistically significant. Six patients(13.3%)in APRA group and 4(8.9%)in FCBT group had IOP elevations of 5 to <10 mm Hg at least one postoperative IOP measurement. This difference was not statistically significant(<i>P</i>=0.243). IOP elevations of 10 mm Hg or more occurred in 3 eyes(6.7%)in the APRA group and 1 eyes(2.2%)in the FCBT group; this was not statistically significant(<i>P</i>=0.542). <p>CONCLUSION:Both of APRA and FCBT are effective for prevention and APRA is enough for most of routine cases. FCBT may be an option for the eyes those need more IOP reduction such as pre-existing glaucoma patients who are at higher risk for postoperative IOP elevations.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2016/1/201601004.pdfapraclonidinebrinzolamidetimolollaser capsulotomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erkan &#xC7;elik
Gonul Altun
Gursoy Alagoz
spellingShingle Erkan &#xC7;elik
Gonul Altun
Gursoy Alagoz
Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
apraclonidine
brinzolamide
timolol
laser capsulotomy
author_facet Erkan &#xC7;elik
Gonul Altun
Gursoy Alagoz
author_sort Erkan &#xC7;elik
title Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
title_short Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
title_full Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
title_fullStr Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
title_full_unstemmed Apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
title_sort apraclonidine versus brinzolamide-timolol combination to prevent intraocular pressure elevation after laser capsulotomy
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
publishDate 2016-01-01
description AIM: To compare the efficacy of fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%(FCBT)with apraclonidine 0.5%(APRA)in preventing intraocular pressure(IOP)elevations after neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet(Nd:YAG)laser posterior capsulotomy.<p>METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical study included 90 eyes of 90 consecutive patients who had Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification(PCO). Patients were randomized to receive APRA(<i>n</i>=45)or FCBT(<i>n</i>=45)at 1h before laser surgery. A masked observer measured IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry before the procedure and at 1, 2, 3, 24h and 7d after laser treatment. IOP outcome measures were grouped into the following categories: post laser IOP elevation of 5 to <10 mm Hg, and post laser IOP elevation of 10 mm Hg or more. IOP elevation of <5 mm Hg was not considered a clinically significant change.<p>RESULTS:The mean IOP before surgery on the day of the procedure was 14.1±2.1 mm Hg in the APRA group and 13.2±2.1 mm Hg in the FCBT group. There was no statistically significant difference between the APRA and the FCBT groups of baseline IOPs measured(<i>P</i>=0.066). During the follow-up time, the mean IOP was lower in FCBT group, but this was not statistically significant. Six patients(13.3%)in APRA group and 4(8.9%)in FCBT group had IOP elevations of 5 to <10 mm Hg at least one postoperative IOP measurement. This difference was not statistically significant(<i>P</i>=0.243). IOP elevations of 10 mm Hg or more occurred in 3 eyes(6.7%)in the APRA group and 1 eyes(2.2%)in the FCBT group; this was not statistically significant(<i>P</i>=0.542). <p>CONCLUSION:Both of APRA and FCBT are effective for prevention and APRA is enough for most of routine cases. FCBT may be an option for the eyes those need more IOP reduction such as pre-existing glaucoma patients who are at higher risk for postoperative IOP elevations.
topic apraclonidine
brinzolamide
timolol
laser capsulotomy
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2016/1/201601004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT erkanxc7elik apraclonidineversusbrinzolamidetimololcombinationtopreventintraocularpressureelevationafterlasercapsulotomy
AT gonulaltun apraclonidineversusbrinzolamidetimololcombinationtopreventintraocularpressureelevationafterlasercapsulotomy
AT gursoyalagoz apraclonidineversusbrinzolamidetimololcombinationtopreventintraocularpressureelevationafterlasercapsulotomy
_version_ 1725652897472970752