Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
Statement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2005-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdf |
id |
doaj-d62652a2fd3446938026d91edc319244 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d62652a2fd3446938026d91edc3192442020-11-25T03:13:35ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852005-09-01239195Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading SystemN. FarhadianAF. MiresmaeiliMK. SoltaniStatement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate the results of orthodontic treatment.Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the patients’ final occlusion after extraction and non-extraction therapy using the OGS.Materials and Methods: Sixty sex-matched cases with an age range of 15-20 year old were selected and evenly divided into 2 groups as follows: 30 patients were treated by extraction of 4 premolars and 30 received a non-extraction treatment. All patients had class 1 malocclusion before treatment and were well treated with the standard edgewisesystem in a private clinic. With the aid of an ABO measuring gauge, 8 parameters of occlusion were measured 3 times,each. Reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated by use of the Phi correlation coefficient and the total OGS scores between thetwo groups were compared using Levene`s test and Student t- test with the significant level at 95%.Results: The mean OSG scores were significantly more negative in the non–extraction group (-6.58 ± 8.63) as compared to the extraction group (-28.65 ± 6.67, p < 0.004).Acceptable occlusion was observed in 73.4% of the extraction and 43.4% of the nonextraction cases.Conclusion: In this study according to the ABO grading system (OGS), the final occlusion of patients treated with extraction seemed more acceptable than non-extracted cases.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdfOrthodonticsOcclusionCrowdingDental Arch |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
N. Farhadian AF. Miresmaeili MK. Soltani |
spellingShingle |
N. Farhadian AF. Miresmaeili MK. Soltani Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Orthodontics Occlusion Crowding Dental Arch |
author_facet |
N. Farhadian AF. Miresmaeili MK. Soltani |
author_sort |
N. Farhadian |
title |
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System |
title_short |
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System |
title_full |
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System |
title_sort |
comparison of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the objective grading system |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
issn |
2008-2185 |
publishDate |
2005-09-01 |
description |
Statement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate the results of orthodontic treatment.Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the patients’ final occlusion after extraction and non-extraction therapy using the OGS.Materials and Methods: Sixty sex-matched cases with an age range of 15-20 year old were selected and evenly divided into 2 groups as follows: 30 patients were treated by extraction of 4 premolars and 30 received a non-extraction treatment. All patients had class 1 malocclusion before treatment and were well treated with the standard edgewisesystem in a private clinic. With the aid of an ABO measuring gauge, 8 parameters of occlusion were measured 3 times,each. Reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated by use of the Phi correlation coefficient and the total OGS scores between thetwo groups were compared using Levene`s test and Student t- test with the significant level at 95%.Results: The mean OSG scores were significantly more negative in the non–extraction group (-6.58 ± 8.63) as compared to the extraction group (-28.65 ± 6.67, p < 0.004).Acceptable occlusion was observed in 73.4% of the extraction and 43.4% of the nonextraction cases.Conclusion: In this study according to the ABO grading system (OGS), the final occlusion of patients treated with extraction seemed more acceptable than non-extracted cases. |
topic |
Orthodontics Occlusion Crowding Dental Arch |
url |
http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nfarhadian comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem AT afmiresmaeili comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem AT mksoltani comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem |
_version_ |
1724645874974326784 |