Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System

Statement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Farhadian, AF. Miresmaeili, MK. Soltani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2005-09-01
Series:Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdf
id doaj-d62652a2fd3446938026d91edc319244
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d62652a2fd3446938026d91edc3192442020-11-25T03:13:35ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852005-09-01239195Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading SystemN. FarhadianAF. MiresmaeiliMK. SoltaniStatement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate the results of orthodontic treatment.Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the patients’ final occlusion after extraction and non-extraction therapy using the OGS.Materials and Methods: Sixty sex-matched cases with an age range of 15-20 year old were selected and evenly divided into 2 groups as follows: 30 patients were treated by extraction of 4 premolars and 30 received a non-extraction treatment. All patients had class 1 malocclusion before treatment and were well treated with the standard edgewisesystem in a private clinic. With the aid of an ABO measuring gauge, 8 parameters of occlusion were measured 3 times,each. Reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated by use of the Phi correlation coefficient and the total OGS scores between thetwo groups were compared using Levene`s test and Student t- test with the significant level at 95%.Results: The mean OSG scores were significantly more negative in the non–extraction group (-6.58 ± 8.63) as compared to the extraction group (-28.65 ± 6.67, p < 0.004).Acceptable occlusion was observed in 73.4% of the extraction and 43.4% of the nonextraction cases.Conclusion: In this study according to the ABO grading system (OGS), the final occlusion of patients treated with extraction seemed more acceptable than non-extracted cases.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdfOrthodonticsOcclusionCrowdingDental Arch
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Farhadian
AF. Miresmaeili
MK. Soltani
spellingShingle N. Farhadian
AF. Miresmaeili
MK. Soltani
Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Orthodontics
Occlusion
Crowding
Dental Arch
author_facet N. Farhadian
AF. Miresmaeili
MK. Soltani
author_sort N. Farhadian
title Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
title_short Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
title_full Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
title_fullStr Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment using the Objective Grading System
title_sort comparison of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the objective grading system
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
issn 2008-2185
publishDate 2005-09-01
description Statement of Problem: The extraction versus non-extraction debate is almost as old as the advent of orthodontic practice and up to now, this dilemma remains. Recently, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) has developed a method by the name of Objective Grading System (OGS) in order to evaluate the results of orthodontic treatment.Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the patients’ final occlusion after extraction and non-extraction therapy using the OGS.Materials and Methods: Sixty sex-matched cases with an age range of 15-20 year old were selected and evenly divided into 2 groups as follows: 30 patients were treated by extraction of 4 premolars and 30 received a non-extraction treatment. All patients had class 1 malocclusion before treatment and were well treated with the standard edgewisesystem in a private clinic. With the aid of an ABO measuring gauge, 8 parameters of occlusion were measured 3 times,each. Reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated by use of the Phi correlation coefficient and the total OGS scores between thetwo groups were compared using Levene`s test and Student t- test with the significant level at 95%.Results: The mean OSG scores were significantly more negative in the non–extraction group (-6.58 ± 8.63) as compared to the extraction group (-28.65 ± 6.67, p < 0.004).Acceptable occlusion was observed in 73.4% of the extraction and 43.4% of the nonextraction cases.Conclusion: In this study according to the ABO grading system (OGS), the final occlusion of patients treated with extraction seemed more acceptable than non-extracted cases.
topic Orthodontics
Occlusion
Crowding
Dental Arch
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/2335.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nfarhadian comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem
AT afmiresmaeili comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem
AT mksoltani comparisonofextractionandnonextractionorthodontictreatmentusingtheobjectivegradingsystem
_version_ 1724645874974326784