The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century

It seems that the first two decades of the twenty first century demonstrate political mythology to be still functioning in the political life of the West. In this context, it is interesting to view the recent publications of Hans Blumenberg’s Nachlass: Präfiguration (“Prefiguration,” 2014) and Rigor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulina Sosnowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2019-07-01
Series:Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-reinforcement-of-political-myth-hans-blumenberg-hannah-arendt-and-the-history-of-the-twentieth-century/
id doaj-d6034a464a684df798340d13e49838f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6034a464a684df798340d13e49838f22021-01-02T10:16:22ZengUniversity of WarsawEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture2544-302X2544-302X2019-07-0132516110.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0017The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth CenturyPaulina Sosnowska0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-8160Faculty of Education, University of WarsawIt seems that the first two decades of the twenty first century demonstrate political mythology to be still functioning in the political life of the West. In this context, it is interesting to view the recent publications of Hans Blumenberg’s Nachlass: Präfiguration (“Prefiguration,” 2014) and Rigorismus der Wahrheit (“Rigorism of Truth,” 2015), as they reveal unpredicted complications for the interpretation of his philosophy of myth as well as of his political stances. They also evoke some more general questions concerning the role of myth in our contemporary political life. The aim of this article is to present the paradoxes connected with the posthumously published Blumenberg critique of Hannah Arendt and to situate it in the wider context of twentieth century political thought, specifically the work of Sorel, Schmitt, Rosenberg and Cassirer. It is also to point to more general ethical and political ambiguities connected with the problem of political mythology in the present.http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-reinforcement-of-political-myth-hans-blumenberg-hannah-arendt-and-the-history-of-the-twentieth-century/political mytheichmann’s trialhannah arendthans blumenbergviolence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulina Sosnowska
spellingShingle Paulina Sosnowska
The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
political myth
eichmann’s trial
hannah arendt
hans blumenberg
violence
author_facet Paulina Sosnowska
author_sort Paulina Sosnowska
title The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
title_short The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
title_full The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
title_fullStr The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
title_full_unstemmed The Reinforcement of Political Myth? Hans Blumenberg, Hannah Arendt and the History of the Twentieth Century
title_sort reinforcement of political myth? hans blumenberg, hannah arendt and the history of the twentieth century
publisher University of Warsaw
series Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
issn 2544-302X
2544-302X
publishDate 2019-07-01
description It seems that the first two decades of the twenty first century demonstrate political mythology to be still functioning in the political life of the West. In this context, it is interesting to view the recent publications of Hans Blumenberg’s Nachlass: Präfiguration (“Prefiguration,” 2014) and Rigorismus der Wahrheit (“Rigorism of Truth,” 2015), as they reveal unpredicted complications for the interpretation of his philosophy of myth as well as of his political stances. They also evoke some more general questions concerning the role of myth in our contemporary political life. The aim of this article is to present the paradoxes connected with the posthumously published Blumenberg critique of Hannah Arendt and to situate it in the wider context of twentieth century political thought, specifically the work of Sorel, Schmitt, Rosenberg and Cassirer. It is also to point to more general ethical and political ambiguities connected with the problem of political mythology in the present.
topic political myth
eichmann’s trial
hannah arendt
hans blumenberg
violence
url http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-reinforcement-of-political-myth-hans-blumenberg-hannah-arendt-and-the-history-of-the-twentieth-century/
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinasosnowska thereinforcementofpoliticalmythhansblumenberghannaharendtandthehistoryofthetwentiethcentury
AT paulinasosnowska reinforcementofpoliticalmythhansblumenberghannaharendtandthehistoryofthetwentiethcentury
_version_ 1724355595068243968