The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.

The Chinese writing system provides an excellent case for testing the contribution of segmental and suprasegmental information in reading words aloud within the same language. In logographic Chinese characters, neither segmental nor tonal information is explicitly represented, whereas in Pinyin, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Wang, Chuchu Li, Candise Y Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4638349?pdf=render
id doaj-d5f224a549764ede8b35a352d2b4b2f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5f224a549764ede8b35a352d2b4b2f32020-11-24T20:45:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014206010.1371/journal.pone.0142060The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.Min WangChuchu LiCandise Y LinThe Chinese writing system provides an excellent case for testing the contribution of segmental and suprasegmental information in reading words aloud within the same language. In logographic Chinese characters, neither segmental nor tonal information is explicitly represented, whereas in Pinyin, an alphabetic transcription of the character, both are explicitly represented. Two primed naming experiments were conducted in which the targets were always written characters. When logographic characters served as the primes (Experiment 1), syllable segmental and tonal information appeared to be represented and encoded as an integral unit which in turn facilitated target character naming. When Pinyin served as the primes (Experiment 2), the explicit phonetic representation facilitated encoding of both segmental and suprasegmental information, but with later access to suprasegmental information. In addition, Chinese speakers were faster to name characters than Pinyin in a simple naming task (Experiment 3), suggesting that Pinyin may be read via a phonological assembly route, whereas characters may be read via a lexical route. Taken together, our findings point to the need to consider the contributions of both segmental and suprasegmental information and the time course in the well-established models for reading aloud, as well as the cognitive mechanisms underlying the reading aloud of logographic characters versus alphabetic Pinyin script.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4638349?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min Wang
Chuchu Li
Candise Y Lin
spellingShingle Min Wang
Chuchu Li
Candise Y Lin
The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Min Wang
Chuchu Li
Candise Y Lin
author_sort Min Wang
title The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
title_short The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
title_full The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
title_fullStr The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
title_full_unstemmed The Contributions of Segmental and Suprasegmental Information in Reading Chinese Characters Aloud.
title_sort contributions of segmental and suprasegmental information in reading chinese characters aloud.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The Chinese writing system provides an excellent case for testing the contribution of segmental and suprasegmental information in reading words aloud within the same language. In logographic Chinese characters, neither segmental nor tonal information is explicitly represented, whereas in Pinyin, an alphabetic transcription of the character, both are explicitly represented. Two primed naming experiments were conducted in which the targets were always written characters. When logographic characters served as the primes (Experiment 1), syllable segmental and tonal information appeared to be represented and encoded as an integral unit which in turn facilitated target character naming. When Pinyin served as the primes (Experiment 2), the explicit phonetic representation facilitated encoding of both segmental and suprasegmental information, but with later access to suprasegmental information. In addition, Chinese speakers were faster to name characters than Pinyin in a simple naming task (Experiment 3), suggesting that Pinyin may be read via a phonological assembly route, whereas characters may be read via a lexical route. Taken together, our findings point to the need to consider the contributions of both segmental and suprasegmental information and the time course in the well-established models for reading aloud, as well as the cognitive mechanisms underlying the reading aloud of logographic characters versus alphabetic Pinyin script.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4638349?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT minwang thecontributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
AT chuchuli thecontributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
AT candiseylin thecontributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
AT minwang contributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
AT chuchuli contributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
AT candiseylin contributionsofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalinformationinreadingchinesecharactersaloud
_version_ 1716814340563140608