Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study
Background: Arch wire surface characteristics, especially surface roughness and topography, influence the coefficient of friction during sliding. The clinician should be familiar with the properties of orthodontic appliances and materials that could result in high friction to maximize the efficiency...
Main Authors: | Nouf Alsabti, Nabeel Talic |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220301784 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of surface topography of low-friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires using atomic force microscopy
by: Nouf I Alsabti, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
The comparison of frictional resistance in titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets using stainless steel and TMA archwires: An in vitro study
by: Syed Altaf Khalid, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Evaluation of frictional resistance between monocrystalline (ICE) brakcets and Stainless Steel, Beta TMA and NiTi arch wires
by: Meysam Mirzaie, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Stiffness comparison of mushroom and straight SS and TMA lingual archwires
by: Luca Lombardo, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Evaluation of frictional resistance between monocrystalline (ICE) brakcets and Stainless Steel, Beta TMA and NiTiarch wires
by: Meysam Mirzaie, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01)