Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow

Pressure fluctuation in single-phase pumps has been studied widely, while less attention has been paid to research on multiphase pumps that are commonly used in the petroleum chemical industry. Therefore, this study investigates the pressure fluctuation for a multiphase rotodynamic pump handling air...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang Wenwu, Yu Zhiyi, Li Yongjiang, Yang Jianxin, Ye Qing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:Oil & Gas Science and Technology
Online Access:https://ogst.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/articles/ogst/full_html/2019/01/ogst180294/ogst180294.html
id doaj-d5b9cdcdb55e41c6b1806b6437f719a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5b9cdcdb55e41c6b1806b6437f719a82021-02-02T05:05:50ZengEDP SciencesOil & Gas Science and Technology1294-44751953-81892019-01-01741810.2516/ogst/2018101ogst180294Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flowZhang WenwuYu ZhiyiLi YongjiangYang JianxinYe QingPressure fluctuation in single-phase pumps has been studied widely, while less attention has been paid to research on multiphase pumps that are commonly used in the petroleum chemical industry. Therefore, this study investigates the pressure fluctuation for a multiphase rotodynamic pump handling air–water two-phase flow. Simulations based on the Euler two-fluid model were carried out using ANSYS_CFX16.0 at different Inlet Gas Void Fractions (IGVFs) and various flow rate values. Under conditions of IGVF = 0% (pure water) and IGVF = 15%, the accuracy of the numerical method was tested by comparing the experimental data. The results showed that the rotor–stator interaction was still the main generation driver of pressure fluctuation in gas–liquid two-phase pumps. However, the fluctuation near the impeller outlet ascribe to the rotor–stator interaction was weakened by the complex gas–liquid flow. For the different IGVF, the variation trend of fluctuation was similar along the streamwise direction. That is, the fluctuation in the impeller increased before decreasing, while in the guide vane it decreased gradually. Also, the fluctuation in the guide vane was generally greater than for the impeller and the maximum amplitude appeared in the vicinity of guide vane inlet.https://ogst.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/articles/ogst/full_html/2019/01/ogst180294/ogst180294.html
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhang Wenwu
Yu Zhiyi
Li Yongjiang
Yang Jianxin
Ye Qing
spellingShingle Zhang Wenwu
Yu Zhiyi
Li Yongjiang
Yang Jianxin
Ye Qing
Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
Oil & Gas Science and Technology
author_facet Zhang Wenwu
Yu Zhiyi
Li Yongjiang
Yang Jianxin
Ye Qing
author_sort Zhang Wenwu
title Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
title_short Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
title_full Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
title_fullStr Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
title_full_unstemmed Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
title_sort numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air–water two-phase flow
publisher EDP Sciences
series Oil & Gas Science and Technology
issn 1294-4475
1953-8189
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Pressure fluctuation in single-phase pumps has been studied widely, while less attention has been paid to research on multiphase pumps that are commonly used in the petroleum chemical industry. Therefore, this study investigates the pressure fluctuation for a multiphase rotodynamic pump handling air–water two-phase flow. Simulations based on the Euler two-fluid model were carried out using ANSYS_CFX16.0 at different Inlet Gas Void Fractions (IGVFs) and various flow rate values. Under conditions of IGVF = 0% (pure water) and IGVF = 15%, the accuracy of the numerical method was tested by comparing the experimental data. The results showed that the rotor–stator interaction was still the main generation driver of pressure fluctuation in gas–liquid two-phase pumps. However, the fluctuation near the impeller outlet ascribe to the rotor–stator interaction was weakened by the complex gas–liquid flow. For the different IGVF, the variation trend of fluctuation was similar along the streamwise direction. That is, the fluctuation in the impeller increased before decreasing, while in the guide vane it decreased gradually. Also, the fluctuation in the guide vane was generally greater than for the impeller and the maximum amplitude appeared in the vicinity of guide vane inlet.
url https://ogst.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/articles/ogst/full_html/2019/01/ogst180294/ogst180294.html
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenwu numericalanalysisofpressurefluctuationinamultiphaserotodynamicpumpwithairwatertwophaseflow
AT yuzhiyi numericalanalysisofpressurefluctuationinamultiphaserotodynamicpumpwithairwatertwophaseflow
AT liyongjiang numericalanalysisofpressurefluctuationinamultiphaserotodynamicpumpwithairwatertwophaseflow
AT yangjianxin numericalanalysisofpressurefluctuationinamultiphaserotodynamicpumpwithairwatertwophaseflow
AT yeqing numericalanalysisofpressurefluctuationinamultiphaserotodynamicpumpwithairwatertwophaseflow
_version_ 1724304350594990080