Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
High school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scene...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Media and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783 |
id |
doaj-d5b995e1c024491496047d5708c93d89 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d5b995e1c024491496047d5708c93d892020-11-25T03:02:08ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392020-05-018221923110.17645/mac.v8i2.27831440Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism EducationMark Dzula0Sydney Wuu1Janitza Luna2Amelie Cook3Summer Chen4Fawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAHigh school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scenes with stakeholders, including peers, adults, and the institution. Publishing can be fraught with hesitation and fear of consequences for speaking out. Because of this implication, journalism programs can serve as “potentially valuable yet imperfect” settings for the amplification of student voice and civic development, but can also unduly limit students’ self-expression, especially for girls (Bobkowski & Belmas, 2017). What might be the affordances and constraints of digital participation in a high school journalism program? How might youth journalists and other participants navigate exigencies of publishing online in this context? We, the head editors and adviser, use grounded theory to examine processes and develop pragmatic knowledge (Glaser & Strauss, 2017). Through a mix of prompts, group interviews, and participant observation, we develop a case study that demonstrates implications for ‘risk context,’ or the total situation of an actor’s vulnerability brought on by digital participation in publishing online. We describe what digital participation is good for, and for whom, thus further theorizing relationships between agency and co-production.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783digital participationdigital writinghigh schooljournalismjournalistic collaborationrisk |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark Dzula Sydney Wuu Janitza Luna Amelie Cook Summer Chen |
spellingShingle |
Mark Dzula Sydney Wuu Janitza Luna Amelie Cook Summer Chen Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education Media and Communication digital participation digital writing high school journalism journalistic collaboration risk |
author_facet |
Mark Dzula Sydney Wuu Janitza Luna Amelie Cook Summer Chen |
author_sort |
Mark Dzula |
title |
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education |
title_short |
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education |
title_full |
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education |
title_fullStr |
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education |
title_sort |
digital participation and risk contexts in journalism education |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Media and Communication |
issn |
2183-2439 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
High school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scenes with stakeholders, including peers, adults, and the institution. Publishing can be fraught with hesitation and fear of consequences for speaking out. Because of this implication, journalism programs can serve as “potentially valuable yet imperfect” settings for the amplification of student voice and civic development, but can also unduly limit students’ self-expression, especially for girls (Bobkowski & Belmas, 2017). What might be the affordances and constraints of digital participation in a high school journalism program? How might youth journalists and other participants navigate exigencies of publishing online in this context? We, the head editors and adviser, use grounded theory to examine processes and develop pragmatic knowledge (Glaser & Strauss, 2017). Through a mix of prompts, group interviews, and participant observation, we develop a case study that demonstrates implications for ‘risk context,’ or the total situation of an actor’s vulnerability brought on by digital participation in publishing online. We describe what digital participation is good for, and for whom, thus further theorizing relationships between agency and co-production. |
topic |
digital participation digital writing high school journalism journalistic collaboration risk |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markdzula digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation AT sydneywuu digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation AT janitzaluna digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation AT ameliecook digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation AT summerchen digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation |
_version_ |
1724691271953416192 |