Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education

High school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Dzula, Sydney Wuu, Janitza Luna, Amelie Cook, Summer Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-05-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783
id doaj-d5b995e1c024491496047d5708c93d89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5b995e1c024491496047d5708c93d892020-11-25T03:02:08ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392020-05-018221923110.17645/mac.v8i2.27831440Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism EducationMark Dzula0Sydney Wuu1Janitza Luna2Amelie Cook3Summer Chen4Fawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAFawcett Library, The Webb Schools, USAHigh school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scenes with stakeholders, including peers, adults, and the institution. Publishing can be fraught with hesitation and fear of consequences for speaking out. Because of this implication, journalism programs can serve as “potentially valuable yet imperfect” settings for the amplification of student voice and civic development, but can also unduly limit students’ self-expression, especially for girls (Bobkowski & Belmas, 2017). What might be the affordances and constraints of digital participation in a high school journalism program? How might youth journalists and other participants navigate exigencies of publishing online in this context? We, the head editors and adviser, use grounded theory to examine processes and develop pragmatic knowledge (Glaser & Strauss, 2017). Through a mix of prompts, group interviews, and participant observation, we develop a case study that demonstrates implications for ‘risk context,’ or the total situation of an actor’s vulnerability brought on by digital participation in publishing online. We describe what digital participation is good for, and for whom, thus further theorizing relationships between agency and co-production.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783digital participationdigital writinghigh schooljournalismjournalistic collaborationrisk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Dzula
Sydney Wuu
Janitza Luna
Amelie Cook
Summer Chen
spellingShingle Mark Dzula
Sydney Wuu
Janitza Luna
Amelie Cook
Summer Chen
Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
Media and Communication
digital participation
digital writing
high school
journalism
journalistic collaboration
risk
author_facet Mark Dzula
Sydney Wuu
Janitza Luna
Amelie Cook
Summer Chen
author_sort Mark Dzula
title Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
title_short Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
title_full Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
title_fullStr Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
title_full_unstemmed Digital Participation and Risk Contexts in Journalism Education
title_sort digital participation and risk contexts in journalism education
publisher Cogitatio
series Media and Communication
issn 2183-2439
publishDate 2020-05-01
description High school journalism programs nurture student voice, information literacy, and collaboration. Journalism programs do not merely produce commodities; they help students constitute a public within a school community. When publishing online, student journalists navigate relationships behind the scenes with stakeholders, including peers, adults, and the institution. Publishing can be fraught with hesitation and fear of consequences for speaking out. Because of this implication, journalism programs can serve as “potentially valuable yet imperfect” settings for the amplification of student voice and civic development, but can also unduly limit students’ self-expression, especially for girls (Bobkowski & Belmas, 2017). What might be the affordances and constraints of digital participation in a high school journalism program? How might youth journalists and other participants navigate exigencies of publishing online in this context? We, the head editors and adviser, use grounded theory to examine processes and develop pragmatic knowledge (Glaser & Strauss, 2017). Through a mix of prompts, group interviews, and participant observation, we develop a case study that demonstrates implications for ‘risk context,’ or the total situation of an actor’s vulnerability brought on by digital participation in publishing online. We describe what digital participation is good for, and for whom, thus further theorizing relationships between agency and co-production.
topic digital participation
digital writing
high school
journalism
journalistic collaboration
risk
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2783
work_keys_str_mv AT markdzula digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation
AT sydneywuu digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation
AT janitzaluna digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation
AT ameliecook digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation
AT summerchen digitalparticipationandriskcontextsinjournalismeducation
_version_ 1724691271953416192