Optimizing Grounded Theory for Policy Research

• Main Authors: Cameron Richards, Farrokh Farrokhnia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-02-01
• Series: International Journal of Qualitative Methods
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621380

Grounded theory (GT) has become an influential methodology for research inquiry which involves the texts of human communication and language use as its primary empirical focus of data collection and analysis. However, influential models of GT have been most typically applied to the process of interpreting nonformal and especially “unstructured” texts such as conversations, interviews, and online communications. By contrast, policy researchers have the rather different challenge of interpreting the innate contradictions, diverse imperatives, and often conflicting perspectives which inform the meanings of policy positions as well as documents across different contexts. Building upon the interdisciplinary implications of recent constructivist models of the methodology, this article investigates how an optimizing “knowledge-building” approach represents an exemplary model for using GT for policy document research purposes. It does so in relation to the case study of a project focused on emergent as well as contextual dilemmas of analyzing World Trade Organization e-commerce policies.