“Dentinal Microcracks After Root Canal Preparation” A Comparative Evaluation with Hand, Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation

“Dentinal Microcracks After Root Canal Preparation” A Comparative Evaluation with Hand, Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of dentinal micro cracks after instrumentation with various types of NiTi files in rotary and reciprocating motion. Materials and Methods: One hundred human extracted mandibular central incisors were taken and divided into 10...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	N. Tulasi Priya, Veeramachaneni Chandrasekhar, S. Anita, Muralidhar Tummala, T.B.Phanindhar Raj, Vijetha Badami, Pradeep Kumar, E.Soujanya
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-12-01
Series:	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:	dentinal defects full sequence rotary systems nickel titanium reciprocating single file systems
Online Access:	https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5349/11437_CE(Ra)_F(Sh)_PF1(SNAK)_PFA(AK).pdf

Similar Items

THE INCIDENCE OF ROOT DENTINAL MICRO-CRACKS CAUSED BY RECIPROCATING AND CONTINUOUS ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION
by: Schroeder, Stephen N
Published: (2016)

Evaluation of microcrack formation during root canal preparation using hand, rotary files and self-adjusting file in primary teeth: An in vitro study
by: Anup Panda, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems
by: Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems
by: Fatih Çakıcı, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Effect of three different rotary instrumentation systems on crack formation in root dentin: An in vitro study
by: Esha Chandresh Vora, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

An in-vitro comparison of canal debridement efficiency between three systems of Rotary, Reciprocal and Vertical
by: Sheykhrezaee MS., et al.
Published: (2004-08-01)

Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals
by: Arvind Kumar, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparative evaluation of cleaning ability of reciproc and waveonegold reciprocating file systems – A scanning electron microscopic study
by: Jayaprada Reddy Surakanti, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Instrumentation Using Instruments Manufactured with Different NiTi Alloys and the SAF System: A Systematic Review
by: Kashmira Sawant, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals
by: Gül Çelik, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

The root canal shaping ability of WaveOne and Reciproc versus ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary NiTi systems
by: Ahmed S Abu Haimed, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Residual root dentin thickness for three different rotary systems: A comparative cone beam computed tomography in vitro study
by: Matam Glore Suneetha, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Influence of the Pecking Motion Frequency on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Rotary Files
by: Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Effect of three different rotary file systems on dentinal crack formation – A stereomicroscopic analysis
by: Elkanti Soujanya, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: An in vitro study
by: Farhin Katge, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Detection of dentinal microcracks in radicular dentin after shaping with XP-endo Shaper, Neoendo flex files, and Hero Shaper using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study
by: Sruti S Bal, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Cervical dentin changes in curved root canals after using Waveone and Reciproc files with full rotation versus reciprocation movement: An ex vivo study
by: Yazdan Shantiaee, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial
by: S Divya, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

The Comparative Analysis Of Manual And Rotary Techniques For Gutta-Percha And Sealer Removal
by: Anca Torcătoru, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Microscopic assessment of dentinal defects induced by ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and Hyflex electric discharge machining rotary file systems – An in vitro study
by: Takhellambam Premlata Devi, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

An In vitro Comparative Study to Evaluate The Apical Seal of Root Canals Prepared by Rotary Versus Reciprocating Wave-One Nickel Titanium System
by: Rasha M. Al-Shamaa, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01)

Number of File Usage on Dentinal Defect Incidence of WaveOne GOLD and Reciproc NiTi Instruments
by: Koray Yılmaz, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Effect of different nickel-titanium rotary files on dentinal crack formation during retreatment procedure
by: Mehmet Çitak, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

A comparative study of root canal preparation using flexmaster rotary and NiTi hand files
by: Tabrizizadeh M, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01)

Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth
by: Lavanya Govindaraju, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

INCIDENCE OF DENTINAL MICROCRACKS AFTER ROOT CANAL PREPARATION WITH TWO RECIPROCATING SYSTEMS: A STEREOMICROSCOPIC STUDY
by: Irina Tsenova, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
by: Xiao-Mei Hou, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems- An in vitro study
by: Koppolu Madhusudhana, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Accidental separation and lodgment of rotary endodontic file into the dentist's thumb
by: Rohit Karnik, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Evaluation of various kinematics in WaveOne Gold reciprocating file system: An in vitro study
by: Sheerin A Sarthaj, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Comparison of Transportation within Reciproc and Neolix Rotary Systems in Curved Root Canals Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
by: Fatemeh Salemi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Centering ability of three different mechanized files while instrumenting oval canals
by: Ajinkya Mansing Pawar
Published: (2020-01-01)

An in vitro comparison of root canal system prepared with either hand or rotary instruments
by: Azza A Dafalla, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01)

Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
by: D R Murali Krishna, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparative evaluation of canal cleaning ability of various rotary endodontic filesin apical third: A scanning electron microscopic study
by: Ganesh Ranganath Jadhav, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

The Effect of Taper and Apical Diameter on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Rotary Endodontic Files Using an Experimental Electronic Device
by: Vicente Faus-Llácer, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

A Comparison of Profile, Race and FKG Systems in Eliminating Enterococcus Faecalis from the Apical Third of Mandibular Premolars
by: K. Nazari Moghaddam, et al.
Published: (2006-12-01)

A Comparison of Profile, Race and FKG Systems in Eliminating Enterococcus Faecalis from the Apical Third of Mandibular Premolars
by: K. Nazari Moghaddam, et al.
Published: (2006-12-01)

A Comparison of Flexural Fracture of Three Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems
by: Lloyd, Matthew Warren
Published: (2007)

The Effects of Two Root Canal Irrigants and Different Instruments on Dentin Microhardness ( In Vitro Study)
by: Wiaam MO AL-Ashou
Published: (2011-04-01)