Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly

Odontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d’Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yohan Robinson, Anna-Lena Robinson, Claes Olerud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/231948
id doaj-d5b1a0b4c41e4dc7bb9556a4e7381446
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5b1a0b4c41e4dc7bb9556a4e73814462020-11-24T21:11:23ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/231948231948Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the ElderlyYohan Robinson0Anna-Lena Robinson1Claes Olerud2Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, SwedenOdontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d’Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in the elderly with regard to survival, nonunion, and complications. After a systematic literature research 38 publications were included. A cumulative analysis of 1284 published cases found greater survival if elderly patients with odontoid fractures type II received surgical treatment (RR = 0.64). With regard to nonunion in 669 published cases primary posterior fusion had the best fusion results. The systematic literature review came to the following conclusions. (1) Surgical stabilisation of odontoid fractures type II improves survival in patients between 65 and 85 years of age compared to nonsurgical treatment. (2) Posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid fractures type II in the elderly has the greatest bony union rate. (3) Odontoid nonunion is not associated with worse clinical or functional results in the elderly. (4) The complication rate of nonsurgical treatment is similar to the complication rate of surgical treatment of odontoid fractures type II in the elderly.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/231948
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yohan Robinson
Anna-Lena Robinson
Claes Olerud
spellingShingle Yohan Robinson
Anna-Lena Robinson
Claes Olerud
Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
BioMed Research International
author_facet Yohan Robinson
Anna-Lena Robinson
Claes Olerud
author_sort Yohan Robinson
title Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
title_short Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
title_full Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
title_fullStr Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
title_sort systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type ii odontoid fractures in the elderly
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Odontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d’Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in the elderly with regard to survival, nonunion, and complications. After a systematic literature research 38 publications were included. A cumulative analysis of 1284 published cases found greater survival if elderly patients with odontoid fractures type II received surgical treatment (RR = 0.64). With regard to nonunion in 669 published cases primary posterior fusion had the best fusion results. The systematic literature review came to the following conclusions. (1) Surgical stabilisation of odontoid fractures type II improves survival in patients between 65 and 85 years of age compared to nonsurgical treatment. (2) Posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid fractures type II in the elderly has the greatest bony union rate. (3) Odontoid nonunion is not associated with worse clinical or functional results in the elderly. (4) The complication rate of nonsurgical treatment is similar to the complication rate of surgical treatment of odontoid fractures type II in the elderly.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/231948
work_keys_str_mv AT yohanrobinson systematicreviewonsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentoftypeiiodontoidfracturesintheelderly
AT annalenarobinson systematicreviewonsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentoftypeiiodontoidfracturesintheelderly
AT claesolerud systematicreviewonsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentoftypeiiodontoidfracturesintheelderly
_version_ 1716753533752049664