Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.

Marine reserve design often considers potential benefits to conservation and/or fisheries but typically ignores potential revenues generated through tourism. Since tourism can be the main source of economic benefits for many marine reserves worldwide, ignoring tourism objectives in the design proces...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel F Viana, Benjamin S Halpern, Steven D Gaines
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5739484?pdf=render
id doaj-d5a198c2ee914d0bbfd9710825fa1fa8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5a198c2ee914d0bbfd9710825fa1fa82020-11-25T00:24:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011212e019018710.1371/journal.pone.0190187Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.Daniel F VianaBenjamin S HalpernSteven D GainesMarine reserve design often considers potential benefits to conservation and/or fisheries but typically ignores potential revenues generated through tourism. Since tourism can be the main source of economic benefits for many marine reserves worldwide, ignoring tourism objectives in the design process might lead to sub-optimal outcomes. To incorporate tourism benefits into marine reserve design, we develop a bioeconomic model that tracks tourism and fisheries revenues through time for different management options and location characteristics. Results from the model show that accounting for tourism benefits will ultimately motivate greater ocean protection. Our findings demonstrate that marine reserves are part of the optimal economic solution even in situations with optimal fisheries management and low tourism value relative to fisheries. The extent of optimal protection depends on specific location characteristics, such as tourism potential and other local amenities, and the species recreational divers care about. Additionally, as tourism value increases, optimal reserve area also increases. Finally, we demonstrate how tradeoffs between the two services depend on location attributes and management of the fishery outside marine reserve borders. Understanding when unavoidable tradeoffs will arise helps identify those situations where communities must choose between competing interests.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5739484?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel F Viana
Benjamin S Halpern
Steven D Gaines
spellingShingle Daniel F Viana
Benjamin S Halpern
Steven D Gaines
Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daniel F Viana
Benjamin S Halpern
Steven D Gaines
author_sort Daniel F Viana
title Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
title_short Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
title_full Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
title_fullStr Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
title_sort accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Marine reserve design often considers potential benefits to conservation and/or fisheries but typically ignores potential revenues generated through tourism. Since tourism can be the main source of economic benefits for many marine reserves worldwide, ignoring tourism objectives in the design process might lead to sub-optimal outcomes. To incorporate tourism benefits into marine reserve design, we develop a bioeconomic model that tracks tourism and fisheries revenues through time for different management options and location characteristics. Results from the model show that accounting for tourism benefits will ultimately motivate greater ocean protection. Our findings demonstrate that marine reserves are part of the optimal economic solution even in situations with optimal fisheries management and low tourism value relative to fisheries. The extent of optimal protection depends on specific location characteristics, such as tourism potential and other local amenities, and the species recreational divers care about. Additionally, as tourism value increases, optimal reserve area also increases. Finally, we demonstrate how tradeoffs between the two services depend on location attributes and management of the fishery outside marine reserve borders. Understanding when unavoidable tradeoffs will arise helps identify those situations where communities must choose between competing interests.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5739484?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielfviana accountingfortourismbenefitsinmarinereservedesign
AT benjaminshalpern accountingfortourismbenefitsinmarinereservedesign
AT stevendgaines accountingfortourismbenefitsinmarinereservedesign
_version_ 1725353677894451200