Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control

Abstract Background Central Sensitization (CS) involves dysfunction in neurophysiological mechanisms that increase neuronal responses to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli in the central nervous system. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is considered the leading patient-reported outcome me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jani Mikkonen, Hannu Luomajoki, Olavi Airaksinen, Randy Neblett, Tuomas Selander, Ville Leinonen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02151-6
id doaj-d590a618a5f4493280adefd8b9e3c2b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d590a618a5f4493280adefd8b9e3c2b62021-04-04T11:24:07ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772021-03-0121111510.1186/s12883-021-02151-6Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural controlJani Mikkonen0Hannu Luomajoki1Olavi Airaksinen2Randy Neblett3Tuomas Selander4Ville Leinonen5Private practiceZHAW School of Health ProfessionsDepartment of Surgery (incl. Physiatry), Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern FinlandPRIDE Research FoundationScience Service Center, Kuopio University HospitalInstitute of Clinical Medicine-Neurosurgery, University of Eastern FinlandAbstract Background Central Sensitization (CS) involves dysfunction in neurophysiological mechanisms that increase neuronal responses to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli in the central nervous system. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is considered the leading patient-reported outcome measure for assessing CS-related symptoms. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CSI into Finnish (CSI-FI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods Translation and cross-cultural validation of the CSI was conducted according to established guidelines. The validation sample was 229 subjects, including 42 pain free controls and 187 subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The CSI-FI was evaluated for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction, relationship with subject-reported outcome measures [Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), the Depression scale (DEPS), 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5 L-5D), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Pain and Sleep Questionnaire Three-Item Index (PSQ-3)], pain history, subjective symptoms of dizziness, and CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Furthermore, we studied the ability of the CSI-FI to distinguish pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. In addition, we studied the relationship of CSI-FI scores with postural control on a force plate. Results The CSI-FI demonstrated good internal consistency (0.884) and excellent test-retest reliability (0.933) with a 7 ± 1 day gap between test administrations. Exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction yielded a one factor solution. Fair to good correlations were found between the CSI-FI and the TSK, DEPS, EQ-5 L-5D, RMDQ, and PSQ-3. Subjective symptoms of dizziness correlated better with CSI-FI scores than any of the CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Total CSI-FI scores successfully distinguished between pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. The multisite pain group reported significantly more dizziness symptoms than the other two groups. Force plate measurements showed no relationship between postural control and CSI-FI scores. Conclusion The CSI-FI translation was successfully cross-culturally adapted and validated into Finnish. CSI-FI psychometric properties and scores were all in acceptable levels and in line with previous CSI validations. The CSI-FI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing CS-related symptomology in Finnish-speaking populations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02151-6Central sensitizationCentral sensitization inventoryPsychometric validationMusculoskeletal painChronic painLow back pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jani Mikkonen
Hannu Luomajoki
Olavi Airaksinen
Randy Neblett
Tuomas Selander
Ville Leinonen
spellingShingle Jani Mikkonen
Hannu Luomajoki
Olavi Airaksinen
Randy Neblett
Tuomas Selander
Ville Leinonen
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
BMC Neurology
Central sensitization
Central sensitization inventory
Psychometric validation
Musculoskeletal pain
Chronic pain
Low back pain
author_facet Jani Mikkonen
Hannu Luomajoki
Olavi Airaksinen
Randy Neblett
Tuomas Selander
Ville Leinonen
author_sort Jani Mikkonen
title Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control
publisher BMC
series BMC Neurology
issn 1471-2377
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Central Sensitization (CS) involves dysfunction in neurophysiological mechanisms that increase neuronal responses to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli in the central nervous system. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is considered the leading patient-reported outcome measure for assessing CS-related symptoms. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CSI into Finnish (CSI-FI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods Translation and cross-cultural validation of the CSI was conducted according to established guidelines. The validation sample was 229 subjects, including 42 pain free controls and 187 subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The CSI-FI was evaluated for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction, relationship with subject-reported outcome measures [Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), the Depression scale (DEPS), 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5 L-5D), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Pain and Sleep Questionnaire Three-Item Index (PSQ-3)], pain history, subjective symptoms of dizziness, and CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Furthermore, we studied the ability of the CSI-FI to distinguish pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. In addition, we studied the relationship of CSI-FI scores with postural control on a force plate. Results The CSI-FI demonstrated good internal consistency (0.884) and excellent test-retest reliability (0.933) with a 7 ± 1 day gap between test administrations. Exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction yielded a one factor solution. Fair to good correlations were found between the CSI-FI and the TSK, DEPS, EQ-5 L-5D, RMDQ, and PSQ-3. Subjective symptoms of dizziness correlated better with CSI-FI scores than any of the CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Total CSI-FI scores successfully distinguished between pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. The multisite pain group reported significantly more dizziness symptoms than the other two groups. Force plate measurements showed no relationship between postural control and CSI-FI scores. Conclusion The CSI-FI translation was successfully cross-culturally adapted and validated into Finnish. CSI-FI psychometric properties and scores were all in acceptable levels and in line with previous CSI validations. The CSI-FI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing CS-related symptomology in Finnish-speaking populations.
topic Central sensitization
Central sensitization inventory
Psychometric validation
Musculoskeletal pain
Chronic pain
Low back pain
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02151-6
work_keys_str_mv AT janimikkonen crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
AT hannuluomajoki crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
AT olaviairaksinen crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
AT randyneblett crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
AT tuomasselander crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
AT villeleinonen crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthefinnishversionofthecentralsensitizationinventoryanditsrelationshipwithdizzinessandposturalcontrol
_version_ 1721542787513450496