HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?

We begin by briefly situating the tradition of medical education in the West, noting the dichotomy between academic and clinical practice, especially in surgery. We note the change that occurred in medical education from the seventies of the twentieth century, with the implementation of the molecu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clara Costa Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Editora da Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul 2009-12-01
Series:Reflexão & Ação
Online Access:https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/reflex/article/view/1147
id doaj-d58e6daee37d4a3e89ca21c47ba02ce5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d58e6daee37d4a3e89ca21c47ba02ce52020-11-24T22:37:42ZporEditora da Universidade de Santa Cruz do SulReflexão & Ação0103-88421982-99492009-12-0117222524210.17058/rea.v17i2.1147601HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?Clara Costa OliveiraWe begin by briefly situating the tradition of medical education in the West, noting the dichotomy between academic and clinical practice, especially in surgery. We note the change that occurred in medical education from the seventies of the twentieth century, with the implementation of the molecular biology paradigm in medicine. The training has become focused on components and intra-cellular structures, moving away from an integrated view of all human dimensions. Today we are witnessing a decline in skills of clinical practice training, in comparison with Western medical training until mid-twentieth century. The medical betting on scientific research, which is certainly commendable, has been causing, nevertheless, problems especially in the doctor-patient relationship; they have been worsening over the huge increase in chronic illnesses that require a lifelong contact between health professionals and patients. Reacting to this state of affairs, many universities around the world have introduced Humanities in medical training, broad term that can include everything from ethics and medical deontology to matters of literature or visual art, for example. The article describes briefly the three most common types of insertion of Humanities in Medicine. They are listed as: 1 - having a residual subject linked to the Humanities in the entire course of medicine; 2 - the Humanities in Medicine; 3 - Humanities in Medicine. After characterizing each one, we wonder which could actually promote a substantive difference in medical education and which is a farce in relation to that goal. Finally, we note that even the universities that use integrating models of humanities in medicine, they are constantly pressured to reduce the importance of this learning area at the development of scientific research which is required to report students in biochemical areas, for example. It is noted as a more fragile permanence of humanistic education the assessment of medical students in that area, which should express continuity with other areas’ assessment.https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/reflex/article/view/1147
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clara Costa Oliveira
spellingShingle Clara Costa Oliveira
HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
Reflexão & Ação
author_facet Clara Costa Oliveira
author_sort Clara Costa Oliveira
title HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
title_short HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
title_full HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
title_fullStr HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
title_full_unstemmed HUMANITIES IN MEDICAL TRAINING: REALITY OR SCAM?
title_sort humanities in medical training: reality or scam?
publisher Editora da Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
series Reflexão & Ação
issn 0103-8842
1982-9949
publishDate 2009-12-01
description We begin by briefly situating the tradition of medical education in the West, noting the dichotomy between academic and clinical practice, especially in surgery. We note the change that occurred in medical education from the seventies of the twentieth century, with the implementation of the molecular biology paradigm in medicine. The training has become focused on components and intra-cellular structures, moving away from an integrated view of all human dimensions. Today we are witnessing a decline in skills of clinical practice training, in comparison with Western medical training until mid-twentieth century. The medical betting on scientific research, which is certainly commendable, has been causing, nevertheless, problems especially in the doctor-patient relationship; they have been worsening over the huge increase in chronic illnesses that require a lifelong contact between health professionals and patients. Reacting to this state of affairs, many universities around the world have introduced Humanities in medical training, broad term that can include everything from ethics and medical deontology to matters of literature or visual art, for example. The article describes briefly the three most common types of insertion of Humanities in Medicine. They are listed as: 1 - having a residual subject linked to the Humanities in the entire course of medicine; 2 - the Humanities in Medicine; 3 - Humanities in Medicine. After characterizing each one, we wonder which could actually promote a substantive difference in medical education and which is a farce in relation to that goal. Finally, we note that even the universities that use integrating models of humanities in medicine, they are constantly pressured to reduce the importance of this learning area at the development of scientific research which is required to report students in biochemical areas, for example. It is noted as a more fragile permanence of humanistic education the assessment of medical students in that area, which should express continuity with other areas’ assessment.
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/reflex/article/view/1147
work_keys_str_mv AT claracostaoliveira humanitiesinmedicaltrainingrealityorscam
_version_ 1725715934101897216