Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians
Abstract Background Treating chronic depression represents a significant burden for the NHS, yet there is a lack of evidence-based interventions and research specifically focused on this condition. DIALOG+, a technology-assisted and resource-oriented intervention found effective for people with psyc...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5 |
id |
doaj-d56f85525c4c4b918d1fb56bbafff16f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d56f85525c4c4b918d1fb56bbafff16f2021-05-23T11:43:40ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2021-05-0121111410.1186/s12888-021-03256-5Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and cliniciansAleksandra Matanov0Philip McNamee1Syeda Akther2Nick Barber3Victoria Bird4The Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, NCfMHEast London NHS Foundation Trust, NCfMHThe Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, NCfMHEast London NHS Foundation Trust, NCfMHThe Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, NCfMHAbstract Background Treating chronic depression represents a significant burden for the NHS, yet there is a lack of evidence-based interventions and research specifically focused on this condition. DIALOG+, a technology-assisted and resource-oriented intervention found effective for people with psychosis, may improve care for this service user group. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability and relevance of DIALOG+ for the treatment of chronic depression in community-based settings. Methods A convenience sample of 16 mental health professionals and 29 service users with chronic depression tested the DIALOG+ intervention in routine community care appointments for 3 months across 3 different mental health NHS Trusts in England. Of these, 15 clinicians and 19 service users were individually interviewed about their experiences. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis by an analytic team which included a service user researcher. Results Analysis of the combined dataset identified five overarching themes: DIALOG+ Structure; Therapeutic Communication; Reflecting and Monitoring; Empowerment and Powerlessness; and The Impact of Technology. Overall, service users and clinicians were interested in the continued use of DIALOG+ as part of routine care. Conclusions DIALOG+ was viewed as acceptable by both service users with chronic depression and their clinicians who work in community care settings, albeit with some caveats. Clinician training required significant improvements to address the issues that were referenced, most notably around support with using technology.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5DIALOG+Chronic depressionDigital interventionSolution-focusedCommunity mental health |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aleksandra Matanov Philip McNamee Syeda Akther Nick Barber Victoria Bird |
spellingShingle |
Aleksandra Matanov Philip McNamee Syeda Akther Nick Barber Victoria Bird Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians BMC Psychiatry DIALOG+ Chronic depression Digital intervention Solution-focused Community mental health |
author_facet |
Aleksandra Matanov Philip McNamee Syeda Akther Nick Barber Victoria Bird |
author_sort |
Aleksandra Matanov |
title |
Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
title_short |
Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
title_full |
Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
title_fullStr |
Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
title_sort |
acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (dialog+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Psychiatry |
issn |
1471-244X |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Treating chronic depression represents a significant burden for the NHS, yet there is a lack of evidence-based interventions and research specifically focused on this condition. DIALOG+, a technology-assisted and resource-oriented intervention found effective for people with psychosis, may improve care for this service user group. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability and relevance of DIALOG+ for the treatment of chronic depression in community-based settings. Methods A convenience sample of 16 mental health professionals and 29 service users with chronic depression tested the DIALOG+ intervention in routine community care appointments for 3 months across 3 different mental health NHS Trusts in England. Of these, 15 clinicians and 19 service users were individually interviewed about their experiences. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis by an analytic team which included a service user researcher. Results Analysis of the combined dataset identified five overarching themes: DIALOG+ Structure; Therapeutic Communication; Reflecting and Monitoring; Empowerment and Powerlessness; and The Impact of Technology. Overall, service users and clinicians were interested in the continued use of DIALOG+ as part of routine care. Conclusions DIALOG+ was viewed as acceptable by both service users with chronic depression and their clinicians who work in community care settings, albeit with some caveats. Clinician training required significant improvements to address the issues that were referenced, most notably around support with using technology. |
topic |
DIALOG+ Chronic depression Digital intervention Solution-focused Community mental health |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aleksandramatanov acceptabilityofatechnologysupportedandsolutionfocusedinterventiondialogforchronicdepressionviewsofserviceusersandclinicians AT philipmcnamee acceptabilityofatechnologysupportedandsolutionfocusedinterventiondialogforchronicdepressionviewsofserviceusersandclinicians AT syedaakther acceptabilityofatechnologysupportedandsolutionfocusedinterventiondialogforchronicdepressionviewsofserviceusersandclinicians AT nickbarber acceptabilityofatechnologysupportedandsolutionfocusedinterventiondialogforchronicdepressionviewsofserviceusersandclinicians AT victoriabird acceptabilityofatechnologysupportedandsolutionfocusedinterventiondialogforchronicdepressionviewsofserviceusersandclinicians |
_version_ |
1721429513692250112 |