Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract

In this article, a comparison is drawn between the role of good faith in the development of the Roman law of contract and the emerging role of ubuntu in the South African common law of contract. Firstly, it is shown how the Romans realised that their existing formal and rigid laws could not address...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hanri Magdalena Du Plessis
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2019-10-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/6456
id doaj-d5498d8145424b74a876d85112c0dec8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5498d8145424b74a876d85112c0dec82020-11-25T03:30:07ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812019-10-012210.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a6456Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of ContractHanri Magdalena Du Plessis0University of South Africa In this article, a comparison is drawn between the role of good faith in the development of the Roman law of contract and the emerging role of ubuntu in the South African common law of contract. Firstly, it is shown how the Romans realised that their existing formal and rigid laws could not address the changing legal needs of the community due to the influx of foreigners (especially foreign traders) into Rome. In reaction to the changing commercial environment, they introduced flexible legal procedures and a more normative approach to these legal transactions to achieve fairness and justice between the contracting parties. This worked so well that the new flexible procedures and normative principles were transferred to the existing formalistic law. Gradually the existing ius civile became subject to a more normative interpretation in the interests of justice through the use of the open norm of good faith. It is argued that in a similar way, ubuntu can be used to address legal pluralism in the South African legal system, and its application as an underlying constitutional value could result in the better use of the open norm of good faith to address contractual unfairness. https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/6456Bona fidescommon law of contractcontractual fairnessgood faithlegal historical comparisonlegal pluralism
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanri Magdalena Du Plessis
spellingShingle Hanri Magdalena Du Plessis
Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Bona fides
common law of contract
contractual fairness
good faith
legal historical comparison
legal pluralism
author_facet Hanri Magdalena Du Plessis
author_sort Hanri Magdalena Du Plessis
title Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
title_short Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
title_full Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
title_fullStr Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
title_full_unstemmed Legal Pluralism, uBuntu and the Use of Open Norms in the South African Common Law of Contract
title_sort legal pluralism, ubuntu and the use of open norms in the south african common law of contract
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2019-10-01
description In this article, a comparison is drawn between the role of good faith in the development of the Roman law of contract and the emerging role of ubuntu in the South African common law of contract. Firstly, it is shown how the Romans realised that their existing formal and rigid laws could not address the changing legal needs of the community due to the influx of foreigners (especially foreign traders) into Rome. In reaction to the changing commercial environment, they introduced flexible legal procedures and a more normative approach to these legal transactions to achieve fairness and justice between the contracting parties. This worked so well that the new flexible procedures and normative principles were transferred to the existing formalistic law. Gradually the existing ius civile became subject to a more normative interpretation in the interests of justice through the use of the open norm of good faith. It is argued that in a similar way, ubuntu can be used to address legal pluralism in the South African legal system, and its application as an underlying constitutional value could result in the better use of the open norm of good faith to address contractual unfairness.
topic Bona fides
common law of contract
contractual fairness
good faith
legal historical comparison
legal pluralism
url https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/6456
work_keys_str_mv AT hanrimagdalenaduplessis legalpluralismubuntuandtheuseofopennormsinthesouthafricancommonlawofcontract
_version_ 1724577101174013952