Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
We report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological dist...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2011-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/full |
id |
doaj-d53ff753c68848e688580264c7acfb7d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d53ff753c68848e688580264c7acfb7d2020-11-24T21:00:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-11-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.0030612594Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from ChronolexLudovic eFerrand0Marc eBrysbaert1Emmanuel eKeuleers2Boris eNew3Patrick eBonin4Alain eMéot5Maria eAugustinova6Christophe ePallier7Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandGhent University, GhentGhent University, GhentLaboratoire de Psychologie et Neuropsychologie Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Paris Descartes, Institut Universitaire de FranceLaboratoire d'Etude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bourgogne, Institut Universitaire de France, DijonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, SaclayWe report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in lexical decision. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. Progressive demasking was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than lexical decision, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/fullvisual word recognitionCross-task comparisonslexical decisionMegastudy approachProgressive demaskingword naming |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ludovic eFerrand Marc eBrysbaert Emmanuel eKeuleers Boris eNew Patrick eBonin Alain eMéot Maria eAugustinova Christophe ePallier |
spellingShingle |
Ludovic eFerrand Marc eBrysbaert Emmanuel eKeuleers Boris eNew Patrick eBonin Alain eMéot Maria eAugustinova Christophe ePallier Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex Frontiers in Psychology visual word recognition Cross-task comparisons lexical decision Megastudy approach Progressive demasking word naming |
author_facet |
Ludovic eFerrand Marc eBrysbaert Emmanuel eKeuleers Boris eNew Patrick eBonin Alain eMéot Maria eAugustinova Christophe ePallier |
author_sort |
Ludovic eFerrand |
title |
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex |
title_short |
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex |
title_full |
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex |
title_fullStr |
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex |
title_sort |
comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:evidence from chronolex |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2011-11-01 |
description |
We report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in lexical decision. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. Progressive demasking was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than lexical decision, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task. |
topic |
visual word recognition Cross-task comparisons lexical decision Megastudy approach Progressive demasking word naming |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ludoviceferrand comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT marcebrysbaert comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT emmanuelekeuleers comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT borisenew comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT patrickebonin comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT alainemeot comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT mariaeaugustinova comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex AT christopheepallier comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex |
_version_ |
1716779957426847744 |