Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex

We report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological dist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ludovic eFerrand, Marc eBrysbaert, Emmanuel eKeuleers, Boris eNew, Patrick eBonin, Alain eMéot, Maria eAugustinova, Christophe ePallier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/full
id doaj-d53ff753c68848e688580264c7acfb7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d53ff753c68848e688580264c7acfb7d2020-11-24T21:00:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-11-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.0030612594Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from ChronolexLudovic eFerrand0Marc eBrysbaert1Emmanuel eKeuleers2Boris eNew3Patrick eBonin4Alain eMéot5Maria eAugustinova6Christophe ePallier7Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandGhent University, GhentGhent University, GhentLaboratoire de Psychologie et Neuropsychologie Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Paris Descartes, Institut Universitaire de FranceLaboratoire d'Etude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bourgogne, Institut Universitaire de France, DijonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-FerrandCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, SaclayWe report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in lexical decision. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. Progressive demasking was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than lexical decision, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/fullvisual word recognitionCross-task comparisonslexical decisionMegastudy approachProgressive demaskingword naming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ludovic eFerrand
Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
Patrick eBonin
Alain eMéot
Maria eAugustinova
Christophe ePallier
spellingShingle Ludovic eFerrand
Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
Patrick eBonin
Alain eMéot
Maria eAugustinova
Christophe ePallier
Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
Frontiers in Psychology
visual word recognition
Cross-task comparisons
lexical decision
Megastudy approach
Progressive demasking
word naming
author_facet Ludovic eFerrand
Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
Patrick eBonin
Alain eMéot
Maria eAugustinova
Christophe ePallier
author_sort Ludovic eFerrand
title Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
title_short Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
title_full Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
title_fullStr Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
title_full_unstemmed Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:Evidence from Chronolex
title_sort comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking:evidence from chronolex
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2011-11-01
description We report performance measures for lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking for a large sample of monosyllabic, monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in lexical decision. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. Progressive demasking was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than lexical decision, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task.
topic visual word recognition
Cross-task comparisons
lexical decision
Megastudy approach
Progressive demasking
word naming
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ludoviceferrand comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT marcebrysbaert comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT emmanuelekeuleers comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT borisenew comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT patrickebonin comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT alainemeot comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT mariaeaugustinova comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT christopheepallier comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
_version_ 1716779957426847744