Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison

Inverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Delage, G. Pieterse, T. Pregger, B. Badawy, C. Aulagnier, A. Vermeulen, C. Geels, C. Rödenbeck, U. Karstens, M. C. Krol, S. Houweling, P. Peylin, P. Ciais, M. Heimann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf
id doaj-d52aa47936484756bc32a7152a7438bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d52aa47936484756bc32a7152a7438bd2020-11-24T23:18:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242011-07-0111136607662210.5194/acp-11-6607-2011Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparisonF. DelageG. PieterseT. PreggerB. BadawyC. AulagnierA. VermeulenC. GeelsC. RödenbeckU. KarstensM. C. KrolS. HouwelingP. PeylinP. CiaisM. HeimannInverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed the differences between four fossil fuel emission inventories with spatial and temporal differences over Europe and their impact on the model simulated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Large temporal flux variations characterize the hourly fields (~40 % and ~80 % for the seasonal and diurnal cycles, peak-to-peak) and annual country totals differ by 10 % on average and up to 40 % for some countries (i.e., the Netherlands). These emissions have been prescribed to seven different transport models, resulting in 28 different FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations fields. <br><br> The modeled FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentration time series at surface sites using time-varying emissions show larger seasonal cycles (+2 ppm at the Hungarian tall tower (HUN)) and smaller diurnal cycles in summer (−1 ppm at HUN) than when using constant emissions. The concentration range spanned by all simulations varies between stations, and is generally larger in winter (up to ~10 ppm peak-to-peak at HUN) than in summer (~5 ppm). The contribution of transport model differences to the simulated concentration std-dev is 2–3 times larger than the contribution of emission differences only, at typical European sites used in global inversions. These contributions to the hourly (monthly) std-dev's amount to ~1.2 (0.8) ppm and ~0.4 (0.3) ppm for transport and emissions, respectively. First comparisons of the modeled concentrations with <sup>14</sup>C-based fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> observations show that the large transport differences still hamper a quantitative evaluation/validation of the emission inventories. Changes in the estimated monthly biosphere flux (Fbio) over Europe, using two inverse modeling approaches, are relatively small (less that 5 %) while changes in annual Fbio (up to ~0.15 % GtC yr<sup>−1</sup>) are only slightly smaller than the differences in annual emission totals and around 30 % of the mean European ecosystem carbon sink. These results point to an urgent need to improve not only the transport models but also the assumed spatial and temporal distribution of fossil fuel emission inventories.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Delage
G. Pieterse
T. Pregger
B. Badawy
C. Aulagnier
A. Vermeulen
C. Geels
C. Rödenbeck
U. Karstens
M. C. Krol
S. Houweling
P. Peylin
P. Ciais
M. Heimann
spellingShingle F. Delage
G. Pieterse
T. Pregger
B. Badawy
C. Aulagnier
A. Vermeulen
C. Geels
C. Rödenbeck
U. Karstens
M. C. Krol
S. Houweling
P. Peylin
P. Ciais
M. Heimann
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet F. Delage
G. Pieterse
T. Pregger
B. Badawy
C. Aulagnier
A. Vermeulen
C. Geels
C. Rödenbeck
U. Karstens
M. C. Krol
S. Houweling
P. Peylin
P. Ciais
M. Heimann
author_sort F. Delage
title Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
title_short Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
title_full Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
title_fullStr Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
title_full_unstemmed Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
title_sort importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over europe for co<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2011-07-01
description Inverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed the differences between four fossil fuel emission inventories with spatial and temporal differences over Europe and their impact on the model simulated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Large temporal flux variations characterize the hourly fields (~40 % and ~80 % for the seasonal and diurnal cycles, peak-to-peak) and annual country totals differ by 10 % on average and up to 40 % for some countries (i.e., the Netherlands). These emissions have been prescribed to seven different transport models, resulting in 28 different FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations fields. <br><br> The modeled FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentration time series at surface sites using time-varying emissions show larger seasonal cycles (+2 ppm at the Hungarian tall tower (HUN)) and smaller diurnal cycles in summer (−1 ppm at HUN) than when using constant emissions. The concentration range spanned by all simulations varies between stations, and is generally larger in winter (up to ~10 ppm peak-to-peak at HUN) than in summer (~5 ppm). The contribution of transport model differences to the simulated concentration std-dev is 2–3 times larger than the contribution of emission differences only, at typical European sites used in global inversions. These contributions to the hourly (monthly) std-dev's amount to ~1.2 (0.8) ppm and ~0.4 (0.3) ppm for transport and emissions, respectively. First comparisons of the modeled concentrations with <sup>14</sup>C-based fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> observations show that the large transport differences still hamper a quantitative evaluation/validation of the emission inventories. Changes in the estimated monthly biosphere flux (Fbio) over Europe, using two inverse modeling approaches, are relatively small (less that 5 %) while changes in annual Fbio (up to ~0.15 % GtC yr<sup>−1</sup>) are only slightly smaller than the differences in annual emission totals and around 30 % of the mean European ecosystem carbon sink. These results point to an urgent need to improve not only the transport models but also the assumed spatial and temporal distribution of fossil fuel emission inventories.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fdelage importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT gpieterse importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT tpregger importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT bbadawy importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT caulagnier importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT avermeulen importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT cgeels importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT crodenbeck importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT ukarstens importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT mckrol importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT shouweling importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT ppeylin importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT pciais importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
AT mheimann importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison
_version_ 1725580885610201088