Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison
Inverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2011-07-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf |
id |
doaj-d52aa47936484756bc32a7152a7438bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d52aa47936484756bc32a7152a7438bd2020-11-24T23:18:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242011-07-0111136607662210.5194/acp-11-6607-2011Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparisonF. DelageG. PieterseT. PreggerB. BadawyC. AulagnierA. VermeulenC. GeelsC. RödenbeckU. KarstensM. C. KrolS. HouwelingP. PeylinP. CiaisM. HeimannInverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed the differences between four fossil fuel emission inventories with spatial and temporal differences over Europe and their impact on the model simulated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Large temporal flux variations characterize the hourly fields (~40 % and ~80 % for the seasonal and diurnal cycles, peak-to-peak) and annual country totals differ by 10 % on average and up to 40 % for some countries (i.e., the Netherlands). These emissions have been prescribed to seven different transport models, resulting in 28 different FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations fields. <br><br> The modeled FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentration time series at surface sites using time-varying emissions show larger seasonal cycles (+2 ppm at the Hungarian tall tower (HUN)) and smaller diurnal cycles in summer (−1 ppm at HUN) than when using constant emissions. The concentration range spanned by all simulations varies between stations, and is generally larger in winter (up to ~10 ppm peak-to-peak at HUN) than in summer (~5 ppm). The contribution of transport model differences to the simulated concentration std-dev is 2–3 times larger than the contribution of emission differences only, at typical European sites used in global inversions. These contributions to the hourly (monthly) std-dev's amount to ~1.2 (0.8) ppm and ~0.4 (0.3) ppm for transport and emissions, respectively. First comparisons of the modeled concentrations with <sup>14</sup>C-based fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> observations show that the large transport differences still hamper a quantitative evaluation/validation of the emission inventories. Changes in the estimated monthly biosphere flux (Fbio) over Europe, using two inverse modeling approaches, are relatively small (less that 5 %) while changes in annual Fbio (up to ~0.15 % GtC yr<sup>−1</sup>) are only slightly smaller than the differences in annual emission totals and around 30 % of the mean European ecosystem carbon sink. These results point to an urgent need to improve not only the transport models but also the assumed spatial and temporal distribution of fossil fuel emission inventories.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. Delage G. Pieterse T. Pregger B. Badawy C. Aulagnier A. Vermeulen C. Geels C. Rödenbeck U. Karstens M. C. Krol S. Houweling P. Peylin P. Ciais M. Heimann |
spellingShingle |
F. Delage G. Pieterse T. Pregger B. Badawy C. Aulagnier A. Vermeulen C. Geels C. Rödenbeck U. Karstens M. C. Krol S. Houweling P. Peylin P. Ciais M. Heimann Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
F. Delage G. Pieterse T. Pregger B. Badawy C. Aulagnier A. Vermeulen C. Geels C. Rödenbeck U. Karstens M. C. Krol S. Houweling P. Peylin P. Ciais M. Heimann |
author_sort |
F. Delage |
title |
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
title_short |
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
title_full |
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
title_fullStr |
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
title_sort |
importance of fossil fuel emission uncertainties over europe for co<sub>2</sub> modeling: model intercomparison |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2011-07-01 |
description |
Inverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed the differences between four fossil fuel emission inventories with spatial and temporal differences over Europe and their impact on the model simulated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Large temporal flux variations characterize the hourly fields (~40 % and ~80 % for the seasonal and diurnal cycles, peak-to-peak) and annual country totals differ by 10 % on average and up to 40 % for some countries (i.e., the Netherlands). These emissions have been prescribed to seven different transport models, resulting in 28 different FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations fields. <br><br> The modeled FFCO<sub>2</sub> concentration time series at surface sites using time-varying emissions show larger seasonal cycles (+2 ppm at the Hungarian tall tower (HUN)) and smaller diurnal cycles in summer (−1 ppm at HUN) than when using constant emissions. The concentration range spanned by all simulations varies between stations, and is generally larger in winter (up to ~10 ppm peak-to-peak at HUN) than in summer (~5 ppm). The contribution of transport model differences to the simulated concentration std-dev is 2–3 times larger than the contribution of emission differences only, at typical European sites used in global inversions. These contributions to the hourly (monthly) std-dev's amount to ~1.2 (0.8) ppm and ~0.4 (0.3) ppm for transport and emissions, respectively. First comparisons of the modeled concentrations with <sup>14</sup>C-based fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> observations show that the large transport differences still hamper a quantitative evaluation/validation of the emission inventories. Changes in the estimated monthly biosphere flux (Fbio) over Europe, using two inverse modeling approaches, are relatively small (less that 5 %) while changes in annual Fbio (up to ~0.15 % GtC yr<sup>−1</sup>) are only slightly smaller than the differences in annual emission totals and around 30 % of the mean European ecosystem carbon sink. These results point to an urgent need to improve not only the transport models but also the assumed spatial and temporal distribution of fossil fuel emission inventories. |
url |
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/6607/2011/acp-11-6607-2011.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fdelage importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT gpieterse importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT tpregger importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT bbadawy importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT caulagnier importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT avermeulen importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT cgeels importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT crodenbeck importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT ukarstens importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT mckrol importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT shouweling importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT ppeylin importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT pciais importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison AT mheimann importanceoffossilfuelemissionuncertaintiesovereuropeforcosub2submodelingmodelintercomparison |
_version_ |
1725580885610201088 |