Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery

Objectives: The relative merits of hub and spoke models of service delivery are often debated, but accessing data on how they may benefit service delivery can be difficult, and may hinder the adoption of a model which can benefit the health community. Our aim was to provide objective data that would...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David James, Derek Truman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-04-01
Series:Practical Laboratory Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551715000037
id doaj-d52059756ca14060811295db387a4589
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d52059756ca14060811295db387a45892020-11-24T21:33:06ZengElsevierPractical Laboratory Medicine2352-55172015-04-01124Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of deliveryDavid James0Derek Truman1Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1823 344646.; Southwest Pathology Service, Lisieux Way, Taunton TA1 2LB, UKSouthwest Pathology Service, Lisieux Way, Taunton TA1 2LB, UKObjectives: The relative merits of hub and spoke models of service delivery are often debated, but accessing data on how they may benefit service delivery can be difficult, and may hinder the adoption of a model which can benefit the health community. Our aim was to provide objective data that would either support or refute one potential benefit of service redesign, namely the effect on turnaround times within the acute hospital. Design and methods: Data on turnaround times for sequential requests containing creatinine as a request item received from inpatient locations at two acute hospitals were extracted from the laboratory computer system. Monthly data was collected for a period of 5 months prior to and the same 5 month period following the service redesign. Data was subjected to statistical process control (SPC) analysis. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in the average turnaround time of at least 29% for routine requests and 22% for urgent requests, accompanied by a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in upper control limits of least 46% â improving the predictability of result availability and reducing the 95% confidence interval for turnaround times. Conclusions: Adoption of a âhub and spokeâ model has the potential to support laboratories in improving both urgent and non-urgent turnaround times in a cost-efficient manner within acute hospitals, and reduce the variability in turnaround time. Keywords: Laboratory organisation, Turnaround time, Efficiencyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551715000037
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David James
Derek Truman
spellingShingle David James
Derek Truman
Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
Practical Laboratory Medicine
author_facet David James
Derek Truman
author_sort David James
title Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
title_short Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
title_full Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
title_fullStr Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
title_sort improvement in laboratory test turnaround times for inpatients following move to hub and spoke model of delivery
publisher Elsevier
series Practical Laboratory Medicine
issn 2352-5517
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Objectives: The relative merits of hub and spoke models of service delivery are often debated, but accessing data on how they may benefit service delivery can be difficult, and may hinder the adoption of a model which can benefit the health community. Our aim was to provide objective data that would either support or refute one potential benefit of service redesign, namely the effect on turnaround times within the acute hospital. Design and methods: Data on turnaround times for sequential requests containing creatinine as a request item received from inpatient locations at two acute hospitals were extracted from the laboratory computer system. Monthly data was collected for a period of 5 months prior to and the same 5 month period following the service redesign. Data was subjected to statistical process control (SPC) analysis. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in the average turnaround time of at least 29% for routine requests and 22% for urgent requests, accompanied by a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in upper control limits of least 46% â improving the predictability of result availability and reducing the 95% confidence interval for turnaround times. Conclusions: Adoption of a âhub and spokeâ model has the potential to support laboratories in improving both urgent and non-urgent turnaround times in a cost-efficient manner within acute hospitals, and reduce the variability in turnaround time. Keywords: Laboratory organisation, Turnaround time, Efficiency
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551715000037
work_keys_str_mv AT davidjames improvementinlaboratorytestturnaroundtimesforinpatientsfollowingmovetohubandspokemodelofdelivery
AT derektruman improvementinlaboratorytestturnaroundtimesforinpatientsfollowingmovetohubandspokemodelofdelivery
_version_ 1725954904013406208